New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How the Iconic Pillars of Creation Arose

A new simulation could change the way astronomers think about O-stars

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Remember the Pillars of Creation? Since the Hubble Space Telescope captured this spectacular photograph in 1995, it has appeared on posters, T-shirts and screen savers. Although everybody seems to be familiar with the pillars, the details of how they formed have been unclear. A computer simulation may have finally solved the mystery. Using the physics of gas flows, Cardiff University astronomer Scott Balfour and his colleagues have reproduced the famous pillar structures almost exactly.

The trio of gas columns, located inside the Milky Way's Eagle Nebula, earned its moniker because the columns are factories for creating stars. The pillars themselves are the product of a massive nearby O-type star that sculpted the gas with its powerful winds. O-stars are the universe's largest, hottest stars and live short lives that wreak havoc on their environments. Their intense radiation heats up surrounding gas to form expanding bubbles. And according to the new simulation, which spans 1.6 million years, columns with all the features of the Pillars of Creation naturally form along the outer rim of such bubbles as they expand and rip at the edges.

The simulation, which Balfour presented in June at the British Royal Astronomical Society's National Astronomy Meeting, also showed that O-stars have unexpected effects on star formation. Previous studies have suggested that O-stars initiate the creation of stars, which can often be found in their vicinity. The simulation, however, shows that the bubbles around O-stars often destroy star-forming clouds. In other cases, they compress surrounding gas to initiate the birth of stars sooner than they would have arisen otherwise, causing them to be smaller. “We were very surprised by that,” Balfour says. Simulations by James Edward Dale, an astronomer at the University Observatory in Munich, also question whether O-stars really trigger star formation. Says Dale, “I find that the triggering is much less important than the destructive effects, which looks to be true in Balfour's simulations, too.” It's a universal truth: destruction and creation go hand in hand.

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 311 Issue 3This article was published with the title “An Origin Story” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 311 No. 3 (), p. 21
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0914-21

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe