New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How to Grieve Our Changing Planet

A new book on the perils of human exceptionalism

Silhouette of a human made out of different animals

Jason Holley

NONFICTION

We Loved It All: A Memory of Life
by Lydia Millet.
W.W. Norton, 2024 ($27.99)

“In the beginning,” Lydia Millet writes at the start of her latest book, “we gave names to every creature that we found ... home was a garden, then—a garden in the wild.” This opening casts a moving spell that remains with the reader through three sections of potent vignettes that blend personal stories, ecology and history. Terry Tempest Williams called it a “transformative anti-memoir,” a fitting description for a book about loss on a scale we can hardly fathom—grief for an Eden we glimpsed and ruined, at great cost to ourselves and other species.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In 2012 Millet published an op-ed in the New York Times about the toys we play with as children and what will happen when human activity causes the extinction of our “youthful menagerie” of polar bears, elephants and tigers. The op-ed feels like a precursor to We Loved It All—where does the childhood love of nature go? How do we go on to tolerate the impoverishment of existence as nature degrades in front of our eyes and species are lost? Can culture and selfhood reshape themselves in the absence of all this beauty?

Millet’s philosophical and eulogistic tone echoes the past tense of the title. “Our old home is gone,” she writes, before making a case for remembering and honoring the co-evolution of the human animal and other species. She urges respect for the staggering interconnectedness of existence. Millet—writing with all the narrative talent of a Pulitzer Prize–nominated novelist—suggests we are in many ways already haunted by the sins of attempting to sever this connection, even if we preserve the remaining wonders.

In an era of literature where it has become fashionable to make climate change a plot point, it is refreshing to read a book that is both emphatically beautiful at the line level and deeply insightful at an ecological level. Millet has spent decades immersed in environmental work with the Center for Biological Diversity in Arizona. We benefit from her experiences: anecdotes about heat-stricken flying foxes, passenger pigeons, ibex, pit ponies and predacious snails ground the work in earthly, high-stakes reality.

To explore daunting and existential questions about the “extraordinary experience of being, even within a so-called ordinary life,” this anti-memoir does get deeply personal. We hear tales about Millet’s emotionally restrained father on his deathbed, her ex-husband rescuing people injured in an explosion, her life as a parent, her grandfather abroad among prolific huntsmen, and her work experiences copyediting for Hustler magazine. These stories remind us of our own awe, suffering and generational complicity in the destruction of the natural world—the frogs we have stepped on, the atrocities we’ve witnessed, the resources we’ve used.

Millet enters her most profound terrain when questioning human exceptionalism, which she likens to a troubling form of supremacy. She notes the heresy of evoking anthropomorphism and imagining the minds of plants—and our likely underappreciation of animal cognition and intelligence: “What do the others know that we never will? What do they see, hear, and feel that we never have?” In broaching the question of rights for nonhuman animals she asks who or what deserves a life without suffering.

We Loved It All maintains a concern with language and story throughout. “Language was made of animals. As was art,” Millet writes, reflecting on the animal-shaped glyphs that later became human language. She writes movingly of the new terms we have invented to capture the nuances of the Anthropocene—such as “endling” (the last of a species) and “species loneliness.” In doing so, she also seems to question the idea of literacy—not just in its conventional literary sense but with respect to scientific and cultural literacy. Our species may lack the ability to recognize the magnitude of what human action has done to the planet and to reckon with the consequences.

The next step is questioning the stories—and even lies—we have told ourselves to justify human behavior and its gruesome impact on other species, namely, “our monomythic story of progress and triumph—the superstory that captures us all.” Millet believes we ultimately will find ourselves “surprised into speechlessness, standing among the ruins. Led into a dead end by a story that proved untrue.”

These are, obviously, not tales of easy wonder. Yet We Loved It All is run through with wonder, even when it’s painful. Millet’s beautiful prose helps us face, and process, the gut-twisting experience of watching human error unfold.

We Loved It All book cover

Megan Mayhew-Bergman is an award-winning journalist, essayist and critic and serves as director of the Bread Loaf Environmental Writers’ Conference at Middlebury College. She is author of three books, most recently, How Strange a Season (Scribner, 2022).

More by Megan Mayhew-Bergman
Scientific American Magazine Vol 330 Issue 4This article was published with the title “How to Live with Uneasy Wonder” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 330 No. 4 (), p. 80
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0424-80

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe