New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How to Stop People from Flying Drones into Airplanes

The risk of collisions is on the rise as more civilians buy multicopters

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A near miss with a personal drone forced a Shuttle America flight to pull up while on final approach to land at LaGuardia Airport in New York City earlier this year. It wasn't the first such incident. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration currently receives about 60 reports from pilots every month that represent potential drone sightings. No one knows exactly the type or extent of damage that a collision with a small drone could cause to a jet airliner's engine or airframe, but the agency plans to research that possibility in the next fiscal year. Meanwhile technologies and policies that could deter such collisions remain up in the air.

The current prevention tactic is to stop repeat offenders. The FAA works with local law enforcement to contact drone operators who carry out an “unauthorized [unmanned aerial system] operation” to educate them about flight safety regulations. The agency can also tack on civil penalties for “careless or reckless operation” of drones.

But the FAA needs to do more to avert collisions than educate citizens, says Ben Berman, a Boeing 737 pilot for a major U.S. airline. “Most near-collision courses are going to be misses,” he explains. “But if we roll the dice on near collisions with drones enough times a year, eventually you'll come up snake eyes.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Small drones—classified by the FAA as weighing less than 55 pounds—cannot carry the relatively heavy traffic collision and avoidance system used by larger aircraft to track the locations of nearby planes. As an alternative, Berman, a former chief investigator for the National Transportation Safety Board, thinks drone manufacturers should program their craft to avoid flying above certain altitudes or into restricted airspace. The FAA has also mentioned such “geo-fencing” software updates as a potential short-term fix but does not require them for small drone makers.

One best-selling-drone manufacturer has already taken such steps. DJI, a company based in Shenzhen, China, makes the world's most popular small drones, with its Phantom models costing about $1,000 apiece. Since 2014, DJI has pushed out drone firmware updates to clearly show operators the restricted airspaces around airports, Washington, D.C., or national borders. Operators who ignore the software warnings about restricted airspace and try flying forward will find their drones simply refusing to move. “It's like flying into an invisible wall,” DJI's Michael Perry says.

Several other tactics could be hovering just over the horizon. In February the FAA proposed rules for small drones that include speed and altitude restrictions and access limits to airspace where manned planes typically fly. Such rules could be finalized as early as 2016. On the technology side, NASA has been working with industry partners to develop an unmanned air traffic system that could track small drones at low altitudes. The space agency also has tested a detect-and-avoid system for larger unmanned aircraft such as its Ikhana drone, a civilian version of the military's Predator drone. Such technology could eventually scale down for smaller drones.

These solutions have become more incumbent as growing numbers of drones find their way into the hands of ordinary consumers. This year China exported 160,000 civilian drones worth $120 million from January to May, according to the Xinhua News Agency. “We're in the process of going from these very niche hobby products to mass consumer products,” Perry says. “Many consumers just entering this space don't know the rules and regulations in the way that model aircraft hobbyists used to.”

Jeremy Hsu is a New York City–based writer who has contributed to publications such as Scientific American, IEEE Spectrum, Undark Magazine and Wired.

More by Jeremy Hsu
Scientific American Magazine Vol 313 Issue 3This article was published with the title “Cloudy with a Chance of Drones” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 313 No. 3 (), p. 20
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0915-20

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe