How to tell if your dog is left-pawed or right-pawed, according to science

A step-by-step guide to the “Doginburgh Inventory,” a new pawedness test developed by dog behavior researchers

Portrait of lab against black background

Jagoda Matejczuk/500px/Getty Images

Handedness”—a tendency to prefer one hand over the other—is almost universal to humans. The majority of people, approximately 90 percent or so, are thought to be right-handed, with much of the rest favoring their left hand, and a tiny group can truly use both interchangeably. It’s not just us: other animals, including some apes, rodents, and reptiles, appear to have their own version of “handedness,” too. In dogs, this is called “pawedness”—and if you’re a pet owner, it is something you can test with your dog at home.

In a new study published Wednesday in Royal Society Open Science, researchers at the University of Bari Aldo Moro in Italy describe a test for pawedness in dogs. The test sorts the animals into categories, including “strong left-pawed,” “weak left-pawed,” “ambilateral,” “weak right-pawed” or “strong right-pawed.” The researchers call it the “Doginburgh Inventory,” after a similar test in humans called the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.

It’s a useful tool because it can help researchers understand how brain lateralization—using one side of the brain or the other for certain tasks or functions—“relates to behavior, emotions, and cognition, not only in dogs but also in other species,” says Shany Dror, a postdoctoral researcher at the Clever Dog Lab at the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, who was not involved with the new study. In humans, the right side of our brain guides our left hand, while the left side controls the right hand. The same is true in dogs.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the new study, researchers evaluated dozens of dogs across four tests: two “manipulation” tests and two “locomotion”-based tests. All of them are easy to replicate at home, says study co-author Marcello Siniscalchi, a professor of veterinary physiology at the University of Bari Aldo Moro.

In one test, the dogs were given a Kong toy (basically a rubber cone with rounded edges) with treats inside. The team recorded which paw the dogs used to stabilize the toy while searching for treats and repeated the test several times. Similarly, in another test, the researchers tracked which paw the dogs used to reach for a treat under furniture, such as a couch or bed.

	A dog plays with a red toy on left; dogs reaching under furniture right

The “Kong” test (a) and food-reaching test (b and c).

From “The ‘Doginburgh Inventory’: From Hands to Paws in Assessing Canine Motor Laterality,” by Sevim Isparta et al., in Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 13; 2026

In a third test, the researchers measured which paw the dogs preferred when going from sitting at the top of some stairs to traveling down the steps. And in another test, the researchers tracked which paw dogs preferred when they stepped down a single ledge during a leashed walk.

To replicate these tests at home, owners need to try not to influence a dog’s movements in any way, Siniscalchi says. You can also repeat the leash test by walking on both sides of your dog to see if the results are consistent.

“It’s easy to do, but be careful,” he says. Pay attention to details which may skew your results, he adds.

dog walking down stairs and dog walking over a sidewalk ledge

A dog performing a step test on stairs (a). A dog performing the walking-step test (b).

From “The ‘Doginburgh Inventory’: From Hands to Paws in Assessing Canine Motor Laterality,” by Sevim Isparta et al., in Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 13; 2026

After completing the four tests, the researchers performed a series of calculations to give the dogs their overall pawedness score. Owners can also do a similar process at home:

Tally the number of times your dog used their right paw or left paw for each separate task. Then, use this equation:

If “R” is number of times their right paw was used in a task and “L” is the number of times they used their left for each task, then you can calculate: (R – L) / (R + L).

For each task, you should get a decimal value between –1 and 1.

Multiply that decimal by 100. You should now have a number between -100 and 100. That gives you a clue as to which of five categories your dog belongs to for each test: “absolutely left” (–100 to –60), “left” (–60 to –20), neutral (–20 to 20), “right” (20 to 60) or “absolutely right” (60 to 100), according to the study. Each of those categories should correspond to a value of –2, –1, 0, +1 or +2. That’s your dog’s pawedness score on each of the tests.

Combining your dog’s score across all four tests is trickier. To determine your dog’s overall pawedness, add up the total positive scores (R) and the total negative scores (L) separately and then repeat the same equation: (R – L) / (R + L). For instance, in a scenario used in the study, a hypothetical dog scores –1 on the Kong test, +2 on the treat reach test, +2 on the stairs and 0 on the walking step test. That dog’s equation would be: (4 – 1) / (4 + 1). Again, multiply the resulting decimal by 100.

To account for a dog’s consistency across tests, the researchers also divided the total number of tests where the dogs showed a paw preference by the total number of tests. So if, say, your dog showed a preference for either its right or left paw in three out of four tests, you’d get 0.75.

The last step in the process is multiplying that consistency score by the pawedness number for all tests. In the same example as above, that’d be: [(4 – 1) / (4 + 1) × 100] × 0.75 = 45. The dog is “weak right-pawed.”

Five categories of paw preference, from strong left to strong right.

Paw preference score chart, part of the “Doginburgh Inventory.”

From “The ‘Doginburgh Inventory’: From Hands to Paws in Assessing Canine Motor Laterality,” by Sevim Isparta et al., in Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 13; 2026

And there you have it: your dog’s overall pawedness score.

In the study, some dogs showed a clear left or right preference, but there was no overall trend for pawedness across all the dogs. And, as Dror notes, many of the dogs used different paws for different purposes. “It’s interesting to see that, according to the current study, in different situations, dogs may exhibit a different extent of paw preference,” she says. More research is needed to better understand why.

Siniscalchi hopes other scientists will adopt the scoring system to help standardize and accelerate research on pawedness in dogs. “This is a small starting point,” he says.

Pet owners can help, too. “We want to have a very, very huge dataset” of paw preference, “like in humans,” Siniscalchi says. If the measurement becomes “widespread” among animal caregivers all over the world, “we can have more data to study this phenomenon,” he says.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe