New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How We Learn

Insights from psychology can make us better readers, writers and thinkers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When we pack our children off to school, we envision them embarking on a lifelong career of learning. Yet one thing they typically never study is the art of studying itself. Our intuitions, it turns out, do not always map to reality. In “Psychologists Identify the Best Ways to Study” by John Dunlosky et al. we comb through the vast scientific literature on learning techniques to identify the two methods that work best.

In an increasingly digital world, one shift in learning has gone largely unremarked: the decline of handwriting. Different brain activity accompanies a hand scribbling on paper or typing, with the former invoking neuronal circuits of movement and spatial processing. As we abandon our pens and pencils in favor of the keyboard, is our engagement with words becoming more superficial? “The Science of Handwriting,” by Brandon Keim investigates this question.

Yet we need not fear change: as education data illustrate all too well, the number of degrees in mathematics, science and engineering is not keeping pace with demand. To better prepare students for the world they will one day encounter, a dramatic rethinking of how math and science are taught may be in order. “New Techniques Make Math Fun for All” by John Mighton describes one popular approach that has helped struggling students discover an untapped aptitude.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Strong foundations can nurture exploration at all ages. Had it not been for an abiding love of learning, the 49-year-old Julia Child would not have published the cookbook that then launched her culinary career. Grandma Moses would not have taken up painting in her late 70s. And two octogenarians would not have spent 2013 vying to become the oldest climber to summit Everest. Whatever your quest, the science of learning can help you reach it.

SPECIAL REPORT: HOW WE LEARN

Psychologists Identify the Best Ways to Study
Some study techniques accelerate learning, whereas others are just a waste of time—but which ones are which? An unprecedented review maps out the best pathways to knowledge

The Science of Handwriting
As we jettison the pen and pencil in a digital world, we are changing the way our brain thinks about writing

New Techniques Make Math Fun for All
With the right lesson plan, teachers can turn struggling students into budding mathematicians. The secret is carefully guiding their adventure in numbers

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe