How We Learn

Insights from psychology can make us better readers, writers and thinkers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When we pack our children off to school, we envision them embarking on a lifelong career of learning. Yet one thing they typically never study is the art of studying itself. Our intuitions, it turns out, do not always map to reality. In “Psychologists Identify the Best Ways to Study” by John Dunlosky et al. we comb through the vast scientific literature on learning techniques to identify the two methods that work best.

In an increasingly digital world, one shift in learning has gone largely unremarked: the decline of handwriting. Different brain activity accompanies a hand scribbling on paper or typing, with the former invoking neuronal circuits of movement and spatial processing. As we abandon our pens and pencils in favor of the keyboard, is our engagement with words becoming more superficial? “The Science of Handwriting,” by Brandon Keim investigates this question.

Yet we need not fear change: as education data illustrate all too well, the number of degrees in mathematics, science and engineering is not keeping pace with demand. To better prepare students for the world they will one day encounter, a dramatic rethinking of how math and science are taught may be in order. “New Techniques Make Math Fun for All” by John Mighton describes one popular approach that has helped struggling students discover an untapped aptitude.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Strong foundations can nurture exploration at all ages. Had it not been for an abiding love of learning, the 49-year-old Julia Child would not have published the cookbook that then launched her culinary career. Grandma Moses would not have taken up painting in her late 70s. And two octogenarians would not have spent 2013 vying to become the oldest climber to summit Everest. Whatever your quest, the science of learning can help you reach it.

SPECIAL REPORT: HOW WE LEARN

Psychologists Identify the Best Ways to Study
Some study techniques accelerate learning, whereas others are just a waste of time—but which ones are which? An unprecedented review maps out the best pathways to knowledge

The Science of Handwriting
As we jettison the pen and pencil in a digital world, we are changing the way our brain thinks about writing

New Techniques Make Math Fun for All
With the right lesson plan, teachers can turn struggling students into budding mathematicians. The secret is carefully guiding their adventure in numbers

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe