New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

IKEA-Building Robot Conquers Touchy-Feely Challenge

The Swedish company’s furniture has become something of a benchmark for robotics engineers

IKEA furniture is no problem for this bot.

Nanyang Technological University

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Anyone who has spent an afternoon puzzling over IKEA furniture parts will appreciate how tempting it would be to let a robot do the job. The Swedish company's complex DIY kits are something of a benchmark for roboticists, who have worked for years to build automatons smart and dexterous enough to fit screws and wood pegs into holes.

Engineers at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore have now assembled a STEFAN chair using a two-armed robot, whose sensors and programming enabled it to fit most of the pieces together without human help. The team reported its feat in April in Science Robotics. Using its arms, parallel grippers, sensors and 3-D camera, the machine followed about 50 steps of instructions to complete the chair's frame in about 20 minutes.

Furthermore, the robot was made of off-the-shelf parts that “are already mass-produced, so the technology we developed here can be deployed in actual factories in the very near future,” says Quang-Cuong Pham, an assistant professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering, who built the robot with Francisco Suárez-Ruiz and Xian Zhou, both then at Nanyang.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The engineers programmed the robot using conventional computer code instead of training the device to assemble parts via machine learning. They focused on the robot's perception, planning and control capabilities rather than the more abstract reasoning enabled by artificial intelligence, Pham says.

The robot's arm movements may look slow and tedious, but its ability to fit pegs into holes addresses “a superhard problem in robotics,” says Ross Knepper, an assistant computer science professor at Cornell University, who was not involved in the Nanyang research. Knepper was part of a Massachusetts Institute of Technology team that in 2013 built the “IkeaBot” system of autonomous robots, which successfully assembled the furniture company's LACK side tables.

“Whereas my work used vision to solve the peg-in-a-hole problem, the Nanyang researchers are doing it through tactile feedback—feeling whether or not the peg went into the hole,” Knepper says. “The applications [of these two approaches] are both for IKEA furniture, but the contributions to robotics are very different.”

The Nanyang team's technology is meant to be reprogrammable for different tasks—including possibly assembling other kinds of furniture. “The dream,” Knepper says, “is still to have one robot system that can assemble IKEA's entire catalog—but we're not there yet.”

Larry Greenemeier is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots.

More by Larry Greenemeier
Scientific American Magazine Vol 319 Issue 2This article was published with the title “I(KEA), Robot” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 319 No. 2 (), p. 22
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0818-22a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe