Improved Mowing Machine

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This mowing machine is possessed of the valuable peculiarity that in any position of the cutters they are perfectly balanced on the axle by the weight of the driver on his seat, 0, and the draught-pole is so attached that when the machine is "backed," the sickle is raised from the ground, and it can in consequence turn freely at the end of the swath. Fig. 1 is a perspective view of this machine, in which A is the frame, B is the draught pole that can move up and down in the guides on J* the front of the frame, and it is hinged to the .( frame at a point behind the axles, C, on which &j the frame is suspended. D is a driving wheel which also serves to support the frame, and it has teeth on the inner side of its periphery which gear into E, and thus the rotation of D gives motion to the bevel wheels, F G ; a rod, H, carrying the latter, and having on its other end an eccentric, gives the proper reciprocating motion to the cutters in the sickle, J, by means of the rod, I. K is a board or casting for guiding the grain or grass in its fall to the ground. L is a clutch for throwing the wheel, F, in and out of gear ; it has two eye pieces upon it, and there being a small rim on the axle, it holds the axle securely in the position desired. M is a lever hinged to the frame, and having a chain, N, passing from it over a pulley, let into a slot in the draught-pole, and then attached to the front of the frame ; by this the driver can lift the frame and sickle to any desired hight from the ground, and when it is in the proper position the pawl P (seen better in Fig. 2) secures it by catching in one of the teeth upon the rack, R. When it is desired to release the pawl, the driver places his foot upon the lever, Q, and that lifts up the pawl and allows the frame to fall to its lowest position. From this description it will be seen that the frame is perfectly balanced, and that the force exerted on the draught pole in ' backing" will be thrown on the back of the frame, and thus raise the sickle free from the ground. This is a light and very convenient machine, and will, we have no doubt, fulfil the purposes for which it is intended by the inventor, F. Nishwitz, of 134 First street, Williamsburg, L. I., who will furnish any further particulars. A patent was obtained on it Feb. 16, 1858.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 36This article was published with the title “Improved Mowing Machine” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 36 (), p. 288
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05151858-288b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe