Improved Telegraph Instrument

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Mr. Clarke, of Philadelphia, exhibited at the late fair of the Franklin Institute held in that city, a very useful improvement in the telegraph register. By the ordinary arrangement, the operator has to use a key for winding up the register, but by Mr. Clarke's plan the register is self-winding. The winding motion is obtained by an extra magnet being placed in the register, and the closing and breaking of the circuit causes a lever to vibrate. This lever has a click at its end, acting in a small steel ratchet wheel, whieh causes the latter to revolve and transmit its motion by wheel gearing to the shaft of a spring contained in a box, like a watch. A spring is used for a motive power to the train of wheels, instead of a weight, as in the ordinary register. There is also an arrangement by which it ceases winding when the spring is wound to the power necessary to revolve the train of wheels. This is effected by two points coming in contact, and establishing a cross-current, which cuts off the current from the winding magnet, until, by its running, it causes the two points to separate, when the current flows through the magnet again, and the winding is continued. Another advantage of this improvement consists in the tact of a uniformity pf motion throughout any number oi messages being obtained.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 9This article was published with the title “Improved Telegraph Instrument” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 9 (), p. 67
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican11131852-67c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe