In a Vicious Cycle, Dust Aggravates Drought

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Scientists long thought that large dust particles in the air helped promote rainfall, providing seeds of a sort in clouds around which condensation could form. But in fact dust may have the exact opposite effect. "Our laboratory analysis of the desert dust...showed that the particles contained very little water-absorbing matter," says Yinon Rudich of the Weizmann Institute in Rehovot, Israel, and co-author of the study. "As a result, even large dust particles form relatively small cloud droplets." In turn, a cloud produces less rain during its lifetime.

The problem is particularly severe in deserts, which by definition get little precipitation and often have an abundance of dust storms. It is also a cause for concern in arid agricultural regions, where grazing and the disruption of topsoil can create dust that then reduces precipitation. More dust, less rain and even more dust can become a vicious cycle that ultimately creates increasingly more desert lands.

The researchers, who published their findings in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, looked at satellite images and aircraft observations of cloud behavior over the eastern Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of northern Africa during a major dust storm. They found that the clouds hit by dust storms generally contained smaller droplets and made less rain than those unaffected by dust.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"The recent observations of the impact on precipitation of all kinds of aerosols, each with a major human contribution, show a major climate change issue that has nothing to do with greenhouse gases," says lead author Daniel Rosenberg of Hebrew University in Jerusalem. "Still, this is perhaps the climate-change effect with the greatest socioeconomic impact on water-scarce areas."

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe