New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Introducing the October 2019 Issue

Monsters of the Mesozoic skies, the quest for a room-temperature superconductor and more

Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For me, there's nothing particularly special about seeing a small Cessna take to the air. But watching an Airbus A380, the world's largest commercial airliner, ascend is something altogether different. The way it lumbers into the sky just doesn't seem real. Yet mechanical and aerodynamic adaptations make flight possible for such bulky craft.

I imagine I would've had the same impression (and a dose of terror) watching a hulking pterosaur take wing, especially compared with the smaller feathered dinosaurs and birds that evolved later. Pterosaurs were the first vertebrates to fly, and while some were quite small, others were enormous. And like today's jumbo jets, an intricate set of physiological adaptations, which paleontologist Michael B. Habib details in this issue's cover story, “Monsters of the Mesozoic Skies,” allowed them to lift off. They were quadrupedal and had massive necks, for instance, much like the fearsome dragons in Game of Thrones, which inspired Habib and his colleagues when they were naming one of the pterosaur species. 

Pterosaurs are now gone, as are, unfortunately, most of the 110,000 or so distinct varieties of rice that were once planted across India. Some could tolerate flood, drought, salt and pestilence; some had unique nutritional value; and some were just uniquely pleasant and used in special rituals. With the Green Revolution in the 1950s and 1960s, the government began to focus on high-yield cultivars, which can produce a lot of grain but are expensive and vulnerable to environmental assaults, and that number has dwindled to about 6,000 varieties across India today. Thankfully, as he writes in “Restoring Rice Biodiversity,” conservationist Debal Deb has made it his life's work to redress this problem.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Whether it's rice or wheat, we should all eat more whole grains and more whole foods in general, but markets in the U.S. and elsewhere are littered with “ultraprocessed” foods, including candy bars and potato chips, as well as less obvious things like flavored yogurt and vodka. New research, which journalist Ellen Ruppel Shell describes in “Obesity on the Brain,” suggests that these unnatural concoctions disrupt gut-brain signals in a way that encourages overeating. More fruits and vegetables, preferably of heirloom varieties, please!

Elsewhere, scientists recently used a small device called a diamond anvil cell to apply about half the pressure at the center of the earth to a mix of lanthanum and hydrogen. Then they shot the mash with a laser and synthesized an entirely new material, lanthanum hydride, in hopes of finding a long-coveted room-temperature superconductor. Such a substance, which ferries a current without resistance, could accomplish technological wonders. Journalist Bob Henderson explains in “The Stuff of Dreams” how theory and computer modeling are now guiding a decades-old quest that was once based mostly on guesswork and luck.

Of course, whether it's studying ancient creatures, biodiversity or something else, all science involves a bit of conjecture and serendipity. That's part of what makes the process of research and discovery so frustrating and ever so delightful. Fortune may favor the bold, but it rewards inquisitive minds as well.

Curtis Brainard is an award-winning journalist with 20 years of experience in science, climate and energy communications. He was formerly managing editor and acting editor in chief at Scientific American.

More by Curtis Brainard
Scientific American Magazine Vol 321 Issue 4This article was published with the title “Dragon Up” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 321 No. 4 (), p. 6
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1019-6

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe