New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Investigators Find Another Superbug Case in the U.S.

This is the fourth time this new antibiotic-resistant bacteria has been detected domestically

Scanning electron micrograph of E.coli.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

There’s some moderately good news and bad news from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about the new superbug that has been generating concern in the United States and elsewhere.

First the bad: Another human case of the bug, known as mcr-1, has been found in the United States, bringing the total domestic cases so far to four.

The moderately good news: Investigations into two of those cases failed to turn up any evidence the bug spread to contacts of the people who were carrying it.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The reports of those investigations were published Friday in the CDC’s online journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

“These findings suggest that the risk for transmission from a colonized patient to otherwise healthy persons, including persons with substantial exposure to the patient, might be relatively low,” the authors of the investigation into the first detected US case wrote.

The case was a woman in Pennsylvania, who was found to have the E. coli carrying the mcr-1 gene in her system in May. The woman, who had been hospitalized multiple times in the time leading up to the discovery, was being evaluated for a possible urinary tract infection.

The mcr-1 gene—which is able to jump from bacteria to bacteria — makes bugs carrying it capable of resisting the antibiotic colistin, which is considered a drug of last resort. It is used when bacteria are resistant to other, more commonly used antibiotics. The fear is that mcr-1, combined with other forms of antibiotic resistance, will give rise to bacteria that cannot be successfully treated with antibiotics.

Disease detectives studying the case of this woman—and another, a baby in Connecticut who was found in June to be infected with E. coli carrying the mcr-1 gene—identified and tested family members and close contacts who had the type of contact with these two patients that might have led to spread of the bacteria.

In the case of the woman from Pennsylvania, 98 people agreed to be tested. The baby had fewer close contacts; six were tested and none was found to be carrying the gene.

The lack of evident spread doesn’t mean, though, that health care providers can let down their guards.

“Health care personnel should immediately report colistin-resistant bacteria to their local health department,” the authors of the Pennsylvania report wrote. They are from the state’s health department and the CDC.

“Health departments are encouraged to rapidly investigate reports of colistin-resistant bacteria to prevent transmission to other patients and thereby decrease the risk for transmitting plasmid-encoded genes to bacteria that might already contain other resistance genes.”

Republished with permission from STAT. This article originally appeared on September 9, 2016

Helen Branswell is STAT's infectious diseases and public health reporter. She comes from the Canadian Press, where she was the medical reporter for the past 15 years. Helen cut her infectious diseases teeth during Toronto's SARS outbreak in 2003 and spent the summer of 2004 embedded at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2010-11 she was a Nieman Global Health Fellow at Harvard, where she focused on polio eradication. Warning: Helen asks lots of questions.

More by Helen Branswell

STAT delivers fast, deep, and tough-minded journalism. We take you inside science labs and hospitals, biotech boardrooms, and political backrooms. We dissect crucial discoveries. We examine controversies and puncture hype. We hold individuals and institutions accountable. We introduce you to the power brokers and personalities who are driving a revolution in human health. These are the stories that matter to us all.

More by STAT

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe