Iron Production

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Pottsville Journal states that the total production of iron in England, in 1740, amounted to seventeen thousand tuns ; the returns of 1855, however, show a total production for that country of more than three and a half millions of tuns. The present annual production of iron in the world is, in round numbers, seven millions of tuns. In 1782, the total quantity of hammered iron exported from England was 427 tuns. In 1854, the total quantity of pig iron exported was 293,000 tuns; of puddled and rolled iron, 883,000 tuns. There are now in England 599 furnaces, with an average yield each of 6,000 tuns per annum. Two hundred and thirty thousand men and two thousand steam engines are constantly employed in the manufacture. The value of the gross product is equal to $125,000,000. In the United States, ten years ago, no iron rails were made. Two years ago, 135,000 tuns were manufactured. The product of the Lehigh region in 1855, was 140,000 tuns. The valley of the Schuyl-kill produces annually 100,000 tuns. The Susquehanna valley produces 200,000 tuns ; the valley of the Potomac, 80,000 ; and the Southern States, 40,000; Western Pennsylvania, Ohio, Tennessee, Kentucky and Missouri, 300,000 tuns. The aggregate value of United States manufactures, by the return of 1855, was $50,000,000.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 22This article was published with the title “Iron Production” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 22 (), p. 176
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican02061858-176c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe