New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Japan’s 2011 earthquake was so powerful that it shifted the entire country’s location

This “extraordinary” event was likely caused by seismic waves bouncing off Earth’s core, researchers found

A satellite view of Japan.

NASA/Universal History Archive/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Japan’s catastrophic Tohoku-Oki earthquake in 2011 was so strong that it caused the entire country to “slip,” in some areas by as much as five or six millimeters, according to new research.

This “extraordinary observation,” as it is described in a new study published today in Science, was likely triggered by seismic waves bouncing off Earth’s core in the wake of the magnitude 9.0 quake. This never-before-seen event could present a previously unknown hazard associated with earthquakes, says Sunyoung Park, the study’s lead author and an assistant professor of geophysics at the University of Chicago.

Park and her team relied on an extensive Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) dataset to document subtle movement at sites across Japan in the minutes after the 2011 Tohoku-Oki quake. What they saw baffled them, Park says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The co-authors and I, we were all kind of initially puzzled by the observation,” Park says, referring to the movement of Japan. “Because this was such an unusual thing, we took a lot of time going through different possibilities.”

After ruling out other possible explanations for what they were seeing, such as a processing error in the GNSS data, the researchers concluded that “ScS waves”—seismic waves that travel through Earth’s mantle, ping off the planet’s iron core and return to the surface—had made Japan shift position.

Five or six millimeters—about the length of an average adult’s pinky toenail—might not sound like a lot. And it’s not uncommon for land to shift much more than that during earthquakes, causing “offsets,” where you might see, say, a disconnected road. But those movements are typically localized to areas near the center of the quake, Park says. Until now, researchers had never documented land movement at this scale—an entire country “nudged” by ScS waves, Park says.

A set of concentric circles cropped within a rectangular frame are scaled to show the amplitude of earthquakes measuring 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0 and 9.0 on the Richter scale. Each whole number increase corresponds to a 10-fold increase in amplitude. A second set of concentric circles cropped within a rectangular frame are scaled to show the energy released by earthquakes measuring 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 and 7.0 on the Richter scale. Each whole number increase corresponds to a 32-fold increase in energy.

Amanda Montañez

“Dynamic earthquake triggering,” or “when seismic waves from an earthquake ‘nudge’ a fault already close to breaking into having an earthquake” is well documented, says earthquake geologist Wendy Bohon. “However, this paper outlines a previously unrecognized source for this type of occurrence”: ScS waves. “The authors’ observations of triggered slip from this source across an area six to seven times greater than the area that broke during the main shock is extraordinary.”

In this case, it took about 15 minutes or so for the waves generated by the quake to travel to Earth’s core and back. The “slip” appears to have happened gradually, possibly over the course of around 100 or 200 seconds, so people in Japan probably wouldn’t have felt it, Park says. But it’s unclear if that would be the case for future ScS-triggered slips in Japan or elsewhere.

More research is needed to better understand why exactly this earthquake made Japan slip and whether future events such as this might be more damaging. The Tohoku-Oki quake was one of the world’s largest and most devastating: the initial shock and following tsunami killed more than 18,000 people and caused an estimated $220 billion in damage (in 2011 dollars), according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The new findings could help people around the world better prepare for possible dangers hidden in the aftermath of quakes, Park says.

“I think we should be aware of the fact that there could be this potential triggering of an event many minutes after [an earthquake’s] main shaking has passed,” she says.

This “new type of seismic hazard” is one which “we might want to think about,” she adds.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe