Jenny Bergner

Mimicking the chemistry of outer space to explain how planets form

Stylized illustration portrait of Jenny Bergner by Jessine Hein.

Jessine Hein

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The laws of chemistry get pushed to the limits in Jenny Bergner’s astrochemistry lab at the University of California, Berkeley, where she is pondering some of the biggest questions in the universe: How do planets form? And how did life arise in the first place? To do so, she leads a team studying the exotic chemistry that happens under the crushing cold and near-perfect vacuum of interstellar space.

Using observatories such as the James Webb Space Telescope and the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array in Chile, Bergner’s group collects the spectral fingerprints of molecules that are present in environments where planets are forming. She complements the telescope data with lab experiments, placing molecules in an ultracold, ultralow-pressure vacuum to form disordered, porous ices similar to those found in space. Next she and her co-workers bombard that ice with photons to mimic the radiation of interstellar space. “Then we can understand, at a molecular level, what reactions are taking place,” she says. These reactions could influence how planetary bodies form as their molecular components start to coagulate.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Portrait photograph of Jenny Bergner by Christie Hemm Klok

Christie Hemm Klok

Bergner’s research came into public view in 2023, when she and a colleague published a paper in Nature offering new reasoning for the behavior of ‘Oumuamua, the first interstellar object ever observed passing through our solar system. It puzzled astronomers because it accelerated as it left the solar system in a way that comets, for example, typically do not. Scientists speculated about exotic explanations, including alien spacecraft. Bergner’s answer was less dramatic and, to her, far more satisfying: hydrogen gas, trapped within ‘Oumuamua’s icy interior by cosmic radiation over millions of years, warmed up as the object passed near the sun and escaped, propelling the object forward. No mystical thinking required—just the rules of chemistry playing out in interstellar conditions.

“Saying something is caused by magic is a much less interesting explanation to me,” Bergner says. The thrill of discovery, she adds, comes from using the rules of science to explain the phenomena that we see, no matter how strange.

This article is part of The Young American Scientists, an editorially independent project that was produced with financial support from Regeneron.

Andrea Gawrylewski is chief newsletter editor at Scientific American. She writes the daily Today in Science newsletter and oversees all other newsletters at the magazine. In addition, she manages all special editions and in the past was the editor for Scientific American Mind, Scientific American Space & Physics and Scientific American Health & Medicine. Gawrylewski got her start in journalism at the Scientist magazine, where she was a features writer and editor for "hot" research papers in the life sciences. She spent more than six years in educational publishing, editing books for higher education in biology, environmental science and nutrition. She holds a master's degree in earth science and a master's degree in journalism, both from Columbia University, home of the Pulitzer Prize.

More by Andrea Gawrylewski
Scientific American Magazine Vol 335 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Jenny Bergner” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 335 No. 1 (), p. 37
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072026-QVjsfe9B6f5rLRaD7mgbt

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe