New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

John Urschel

The mathematician and former NFL player on the benefits of having a broad background for young people who are interested in science

John Urschel attends Liberty Science Center’s Genius Gala 4.0 and holds a replica of DNA.

Nicole Craine/WireImage/Getty Images

This article is part of “The Young American Scientists,” which includes stories of 28 extraordinary scientists poised to change the world, as well as a deep look at the past, present and future of science and innovation in the U.S.

John Urschel is a mathematician at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology whose research focuses on numerical linear algebra and scientific computing. Before entering academia full time, he played as an offensive lineman for the Baltimore Ravens in the NFL after a college career at Pennsylvania State University.

[This interview was edited for length and clarity.]

What needs to change in American science?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Young scientists are specializing earlier and earlier. Deep research and expertise in one area can help elevate a job candidacy. But it comes at a cost. A lot of good research happens when people can draw on tools, techniques and insights from different areas, disciplines and even fields. I hope we can encourage promising young scientists to establish strong, broad backgrounds and to communicate frequently with those outside their particular areas. Science would benefit from less hyperspecialization.

What gives you optimism right now?

Between funding cuts, rapid technological disruptions and a challenging political environment for science, it’s been an uncertain and, at times, rough few years for science. What gives me optimism is that so many people still want to direct their immense talents and energies toward research. They’re undaunted.

What’s your best advice for an early-career scientist?

Find a few problems you’re passionate about, problems that grab you and won’t let you go. It helps to have more than one because failure is part of research. Find collaborators who know more than you do and learn as much as you can from them.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe