New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

James Webb Space Telescope Spots Swirling Cradle for Exomoons

Scientists found evidence of a distant planet’s moon system forming

A moon forming disk surrounds an alien planet.

An illustrated moon-forming disk surrounds an alien planet.

NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Gabriele Cugno/University of Zürich, NCCR PlanetS, Sierra Grant/Carnegie Science, Joseph Olmsted/STScI, Leah Hustak/STScI

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

For the first time, scientists have directly detected molecules in a Frisbee of gas and dust swirling around an alien gas-giant planet. “I didn’t think this was possible,” says astronomer Sierra Grant of Carnegie Science in Washington, D.C. Typically such a faint signal would be invisible in the glare of a star. Grant and her co-author Gabriele Cugno of the University of Zürich, who published the results recently in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, think the carbon-rich disk is a lunar nursery and already have plans to observe several more; eventually researchers might be able to detect gaps carved in such disks by nascent moons.

Grant and Cugno used the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to pick out the infrared glow from the disk of gas and dust encircling a Goliath world called CT Cha b. Spotting light cast by a planet—let alone a disk around one—is like making out a firefly against a floodlight. It’s easier if the firefly is enormous and far away from the light. CT Cha b weighs a whopping 14 to 24 Jupiter masses and orbits its star about 17 times farther out than Neptune does the sun.

Previous observations had hinted that CT Cha b was gobbling up material from a yet unseen disk, and Cugno aimed to disentangle this disk’s glow of infrared heat from the star’s bright gleam. Grant was skeptical it could be done, but Cugno wanted to test JWST’s limits. “It was almost a game,” he says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Cugno ultimately pulled a “beautiful” light spectrum of the disk out of the data, in which Grant spotted clear chemical fingerprints of carbon-rich compounds such as hydrogen cyanide, acetylene and even molecules as complex as six-carbon benzene rings—substances absent from the material swirling directly around CT Cha b’s star. The disk could be a moon-building zone around the planet.

“This might give us a hint about what material is available for the formation of exomoons,” says astrophysicist Danny Gasman of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Heidelberg, Germany, who wasn’t involved in the study. She cautions, however, that although CT Cha b’s size and extreme distance from its star make it a great target, they also mean that it might be more like a failed star than a typical gas giant.

Even in our own solar system, the origins of moons remain mysterious. Disks such as CT Cha b’s offer a chance to understand not only moons of alien systems but also the moons in ours. “It’s really hard to go back in time 4.5 billion years and imagine how they were created,” Cugno says. “Now we can actually see this process.”

Elise Cutts is a science writer based in Austria. She has written for Scientific American, Quanta, National Geographic, and other outlets.

More by Elise Cutts
Scientific American Magazine Vol 334 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Lunar Nursery” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 334 No. 1 (), p. 13
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican012026-6fiebNi1jwDYaMxBZ4L7sO

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe