New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Kauê M. Costa

Applying new tools to behavioral tests to discern how we learn

Stylized illustration portrait of Kauê M. Costa by Jessine Hein.

Jessine Hein

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Kauê M. Costa was a Ph.D. student in Germany trying to understand how amphetamines cause hyperactivity when he noticed his mice were acting weird. The mice were genetically engineered to help researchers study dopamine in the brain, and they were unusually hyperactive. The amphetamines they were taking calmed the females but not the males. The mice were learning differently based on sex, and this divergence was scrambling his results.

Born in Amazonian Brazil, Costa is now an assistant professor at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, studying how animals learn. He’s applying new tools to neuroscience’s classic behavioral tests, food cues, mazes and lever pressing, trying to understand how the brain decides what information is important and should be stored and what can be thrown out. “We are constantly bombarded with, let’s say, a practically infinite amount of information,” Costa says. “What are the principles that determine what we learn and how we learn it?”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


His work suggests that dopamine is involved not just in helping us learn what is good and what is bad. Dopamine also plays a role in a more complex type of learning that helps us infer what’s next based on past events.

Whether dreaming of field biology or rising fast in neuroscience, Costa is guided by adventure. For this young person who once thought he would explore the Amazon, the brain is more complex, and thus more appealing, uncharted territory. He could have left the U.S. after finishing his postdoctoral fellowship, but even amid federal funding chaos, doing research in the U.S. is still “incomparable.” He teaches his students to follow their interests and their own minds—which now we understand a little better thanks to his pursuits.

This article is part of The Young American Scientists, an editorially independent project that was produced with financial support from Regeneron.

Dan Vergano was formerly senior editor, Washington, D.C., at Scientific American. He has previously written for Grid News, BuzzFeed News, National Geographic and USA Today. He is chair of the New Horizons committee for the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing and a journalism award judge for both the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

More by Dan Vergano
Scientific American Magazine Vol 335 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Kauê M. Costa” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 335 No. 1 (), p. 42
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican072026-52XUY8oqqLrxNt6HgCoRX4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe