New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Keeping CO2 Down

The first U.S. project for carbon dioxide burial gives mixed results

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Deep in the heart of Texas--just east of Houston, actually--a research project designed to answer some of the technical questions about storing carbon dioxide underground is producing its first results. Scientists hope that carbon capture and sequestration could help ameliorate global warming without harming the local environment. The preliminary data at this geologic site, called the Frio Formation, are thus far providing mixed lessons.

Interring carbon dioxide may become an important option for curbing global warming. "By 2050 nations could be burying five to 10 billion tons of carbon dioxide every year," says geologist Julio Friedmann of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The capacity to store many decades' worth of carbon dioxide exists underground.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe