New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Killer Whales and Dolphins May Team Up to Hunt Salmon

Tantalizing observations suggest marine mammals may be teaming up to hunt

In the foreground, a stretch of black skin shows part of a killer whale carrying the tag. In the middle of the frame is a gray and white dolphin approaching the killer whale's head.

A Pacific white-sided dolphin approaching a northern resident killer whale with a camera mounted to it.

A. Trites/University of British Columbia/S. Fortune/Dalhousie University/K. Holmes/Hakai Institute/X. Cheng/Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

We could all use a buddy to help us track down dinner from time to time.

New research published on December 11 in Scientific Reports posits that killer whales (Orcinus orca) off the coast of British Columbia may be forging hunting partnerships that bridge a species divide.

Sarah Fortune, a marine ecologist at Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia, and her colleagues used drones and camera-equipped tags to study the killer whales over two weeks in August 2020. As they observed, they noticed something strange—the regular presence of Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We kept finding that when the killer whales were feeding, the dolphins were there,” Fortune says. “This gave us a bit of a tip that perhaps there was something of significance occurring.”

A dolphin with white and gray sides cresting out of the ocean.

A Pacific white-sided dolphin seen during a new study on potential hunting partnerships between orcas and dolphins.

A. Trites/University of British Columbia/S. Fortune/Dalhousie University/H. Holmes/Hakai Institute/X. Cheng/Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research

So the scientists dug into the data, looking for evidence of how these different marine mammals were interacting during killer whale mealtimes, when animals hunt for large adult Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). The researchers noticed that the hunting killer whales they were studying seemed to show a noticeable preference for following dolphins. In one particularly striking observation, a killer whale snagged a salmon and dined while nearby dolphins gobbled up loose pieces of the fish.

For Fortune and her colleagues, the interactions suggest that these killer whales—part of what is called the northern resident population—and dolphins are teaming up, with one or more dolphins helping a killer whale snag its prey and then sharing in the feast in a striking display of interspecies cooperation. “Killer whales that are salmon specialists, that is what they rely on,” Fortune says. “The fact that they were following the dolphins, trailing behind them and kind of letting the dolphins lead them was really surprising to me.”

But it may be too soon to announce a marine mammal power match, says Janet Mann, a behavioral ecologist at Georgetown University, who specializes in marine mammals and was not involved in the new research. She’d like to see more evidence that the dolphins are truly benefiting and seeking out the partnership rather than merely being exploited by killer whales that are eager to make use of their hunting skills.

“I don’t think it’s been shown as cooperation because I think the standards for cooperation are a little bit higher,” Mann says. “It’s not like the dolphins wait for the killer whales to come and then they say, ‘Let’s go.’”

Fortune agrees, saying that her and her colleagues’ observations support the scientific definition of cooperation they used—behavioral coordination—but don’t yet fit a definition of mutualism, which requires both species to benefit.

Editor’s Note (12/11/25): This article was updated after posting to include an additional comment from Sarah Fortune.

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe