Knowledge Quest: From Proton Anomalies to the Progress of Science in Scientific American

Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina introduces the February 2014 issue of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

"We have reached out into the universe and pulled back an anomaly," write Jan C. Bernauer and Randolf Pohl in our cover story, "The Proton Radius Puzzle." "And so we have a great chance to learn something new."

Their task was a straightforward one: measure the radius of a proton. After using two complementary techniques to get precise measurements, however, the answers they got were not the same. And the values were not just slightly different; they were different by more than five times the uncertainty in either measurement. How could that happen? Could it be that we don't understand the physics of precise measurements or that we don't understand the seemingly familiar proton as well as we thought?

As I look over this feature and the rest of the pages we are preparing for the printer, I find myself again reflecting on how often the lesson that science teaches humanity is "what you thought just isn't so simple." And the scientists' response is not the frustration you might expect but a passion to get to the bottom of yet another delicious mystery. I find that quest very inspiring. The drive to learn and share that knowledge to improve the world not only powers science but underpins everything that we do at Scientific American.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We can support our ambition through some surprising tools, as you will learn in "Why Gaming Could Be the Future of Education." Author Alan Gershenfeld explains that new research shows video games have great educational potential to exercise higher-order skills such as problem solving and evidence-based reasoning. Gershenfeld plans to bring further insights to the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland, in January and is a speaker in a discussion I am moderating on science literacy.

Last (literally), when you get to Graphic Science, you will have a chance to engage in some of your own reflection about the progress of science as chronicled on our most recent nine decades of covers since Scientific American's founding in 1845. As you will see in the images and the data about coverage topics, the magazine—the longest continuously published in the U.S.—not only has chronicled the arc of science over the years but has, like any creature on the planet, itself evolved and adapted over that time span.

Available for libraries and academic institutions for the past few years, our digital archives are now also ready for individual access for the first time. As any science-interested person would do, we invite you to explore the evidence for yourself—and we hope you, too, find it illuminating.

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina
Scientific American Magazine Vol 310 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Knowledge Quest” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 310 No. 2 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0214-4

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe