New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Lead on the Brain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Researchers have long known that repeated exposure to lead-containing substances can have deleterious effects on the body. But a study reported today in the journal Neurology reveals the substance's long-lasting effects, indicating that exposure to lead can cause progressive declines in brain function even two decades after exposure has ceased. The results call into question the factors contributing to so-called "normal aging."

Brian S. Schwartz of Johns Hopkins University and his colleagues followed 535 former manufacturing workers who had worked with lead for an average of eight years but who had not been exposed to the substance for the past 16 years. They contrasted this set of people with a control group of 118 unexposed individuals from the same neighborhood. After studying the lead levels in the blood and bones of the participants over a four-year period and conducting neurobehavioral tests, the researchers arrived at a surprising conclusion. "The effects of the average level of bone lead found in former lead workers was like five more years of aging on the brain," Schwartz says. "Since these declines were seen long after exposure to lead had stopped, it suggests that the effect of lead on the brain is progressive." Differences concerning memory and learning abilities were noted between the two groups.

Schwartz further notes that previous research focused on how chemicals like lead affect children. This study, he says, is the first to investigate long-term problems caused by adult exposure to such chemicals. Furthermore, "Some of what we have been calling 'normal aging' may in fact be due to past exposures to chemicals or other agents that can affect the nervous system," he observes. "This is potentially a very important health problem."


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In related news, scientists at the Health Research Institute in Naperville, Ill., recently announced that analyses of eight strands of Ludwig von Beethoven's hair reveal extremely high levels of lead. The composer spent a good deal of his life in search of a cure for his many ailments, including abdominal pain, depression and irritability--all of which are characteristic of lead poisoning. The new study also failed to find evidence to support the possibility that Beethoven had syphilis, which had been proposed by some scholars to be the cause of his illness. ¿

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe