Lens Crafters in the Lab

Two teams have found a way to bioengineer the cornea--the thin layer of cells covering the eye like a pane of glass

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Image:UCD
DONOR STEM CELLS, above, are divided between laboratory dishes for bioengineering replacement corneal tissue and ice for storage. If the transplant fails, the frozen cells can be thawed so that the harvesting procedure need not be repeated.

If our eyes are a window to the soul, then our corneas are the panes of glass in that window. All light entering the eye must first pass through these thin, clear films of epithelial tissue. Unfortunately, like a sheet of glass, the cornea is somewhat fragile; it can become cracked or clouded by way of disease or injury, in which case vision loss is usually inevitable. Making matters worse, standard treatment--a corneal transplant--typically fails.

Now, however, reseachers have developed techniques to substitute fresh, bioengineered tissue for damaged corneas--in essence, methods for replacing the window glass. In two papers published this month, two separate teams report having restored or improved vision in a number of patients whose corneal damage had previously been considered untreatable. Although the groups used slightly different approaches, they met with similar success rates. And they were sucessful enough that, after skin and cartilage, corneas may well become the third type of bioengineered replacement tissue available in the clinic.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The problem with standard corneal transplantation has had to do with corneal stem cells. This population of cells normally renews and repairs the eye's surface layer, or epithelium, on a regular basis. When the cornea is severely damaged, though, the stem cells too are often depleted. Transplanting a cornea without its complement of stem cells is setting it up to become as scarred and opaque as the one it is replacing. But obtaining a sufficient number of stem cells from a donor cornea can jeopardize it. To resolve this dilemna, researchers have been searching for ways to generate larger numbers of corneal stem cells from a small number of donor cells.

Image: UCD
ISSEROFF AND SCHWAB, a researcher focused on skin replacements and an ophthalmologist specializing in corneal disorders, spent 10 years perfecting their new technique.

According to their report in the July 12 New England Journal of Medicine, Ray Jui-Fang Tsai of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital of Taoyun, Taiwan, and his colleagues accomplished this goal by harvesting some corneal stem cells from the patient's healthy eye and seeding them onto an amniotic membrane matrix. There the smattering of cells grew into a sturdy layer of tissue that was subsequently stitched onto the patient's damaged eye, replacing the bad corneal tissue. Of the six patients treated, all regained their vision.

The other team, Ivan R. Schwab and R. Rivkah Isseroff of the University of California, Davis, reversed vision loss in 10 out of 14 patients. Their results appeared in the July issue of the journal Cornea. Their approach was slightly different: After harvesting stem cells from the donor, they first divided them among multiple laboratory dishes, some of which were placed on the amniotic membrane, others of which were frozen and stored for possible later use. This way, Schwab notes, if the transplant fails, the harvesting procedure need not be repeated.

For cases in which both of the patient's eyes were damaged, the UC Davis researchers also investigated the use of donor tissue from close relatives. Four of their 14 subjects received composite tissue grown from cornea cells donated by a sibling or child. And all four experienced improved or restored eyesight. None of the relatives reported pain during the five-minute donation procedure, and none experienced any complications afterwards.

That said, the results do come with caveats: long-term success rates and risks have yet to be determined. And whether or not the donor stem cells will persist, for example, is unknown. Still, the development offers great promise for treating corneal damage and, more broadly, damage to other epithelial tissues, such as the the lung and the gastrointestinal tract. "The really exciting thing is where this can take us," Schwab enthuses. "Replacing diseased tissues and organs with bioengineered tissue is rapidly moving from the realm of science fiction to reality."

Your Bionic Future, Scientific American, September, 1999.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she has focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe