Letters to the Editors, April 2006
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
LETTERS ABOUT the December 2005 issue included a down-to-earth query about unearthly black holes for the authors of "An Echo of Black Holes," Theodore A. Jacobson and Re¿naud Parentani, and a report of research data complementing Darold A. Treffert and Daniel D. Christensen's anatomical exploration of savant Kim Peek, "Inside the Mind of a Savant." Responding to "Running on Empty" [SA Perspectives], letter writers pitched ideas on how the U.S. can kick its oil "addiction" (the now presidentially sanctioned term).
As a holiday treat, readers (savant and nonsavant alike) were invited to test their recollection of the year's articles when they took on Patrick Merrell's "Wormhole" puzzle. Apparently they appreciated the challenge, for there was not a cross word about it. In fact, Mike Abbott via e-mail suggested with alacrity: "Great crossword puzzle--do it again!"
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
