New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Liquid with Holes in It Created

The pores are permanent, and might be great for uses like carbon capture

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The combination of a rigid organic cage molecule and a bulky solvent has allowed researchers to produce liquids with permanent porosity. This new class of porous material combines the benefits of a liquid with those of a solid adsorbent framework and may find applications in important areas such as catalysis or carbon capture.

Porous solids, such as zeolites or metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), are commonly used in various chemical processes. These materials are structurally rigid and contain permanent cavities of regular sizes and shapes. By contrast, the ‘porosity’ in conventional liquids is limited to poorly defined and transient cavities between their molecules. Despite their many uses, the solid nature of zeolites and MOFs can impose limitations in several areas, so materials that combine both fluidity and permanent porosity are of great technological interest.

An international team involving scientists based in the UK, France, Germany and Argentina has now been able to design and prepare ‘permanently porous liquids’ using rigid organic cage molecules. These cages have the advantage that they can be dissolved in another material without breaking any of their chemical bonds, thus serving as soluble porous units. The authors point out that their porous molecular liquid differs fundamentally from porous macromolecular liquids containing hollow colloidal silica spheres. ‘We took these cage-like molecules, which have a hollow space inside that can be accessed through small windows, and dissolved them at very high concentration in a solvent whose molecules are too large to fit through the windows,’ explains lead author Stuart James, chair of inorganic chemistry at Queen’s University Belfast, UK. ‘In that way we created a liquid which has empty pores floating around in it.’


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The authors first dissolved the cage molecules in a liquid composed of crown ethers—cyclic chemical units containing several ether subgroups. To achieve high solubility in the bulky solvent, the team functionalised each cage with six crown ether groups. Through this approach, they were able to obtain a concentrated liquid phase that flows at room temperature despite the high concentration of cages.

Trapped gas
‘The work by James and colleagues is important because it shows for the first time that a liquid can be made permanently porous,’ says Michael Mastalerz, professor of organic chemistry at Heidelberg University, Ruperto Carola in Germany. He explains that the challenge in creating such a liquid was designing a molecule that is either liquid by itself or highly soluble in a solvent that cannot penetrate the molecular pores. ‘This is not trivial,’ he says. ‘Usually, long or branched alky chains are employed to increase the solubility or lower the melting point of a larger molecule, but linear alkyl chains can penetrate into the cavities of adjacent molecules, resulting in non-porous liquids. James et al used a clever trick to solve this problem: they combined a porous crown-ether-decorated molecule with a crown ether.’

The researchers characterised the new material by combining molecular dynamics simulations with positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy—a technique commonly used to study voids and defects in solids—and found that the porous liquids could dissolve unusually large amounts of gas. ‘Small gas molecules such as methane were able to get through the windows into the pores, so what we saw was that the pores massively increased the solubility of this gas,’ James says. The team demonstrated that cages with small peripheral groups could also be used to create porous liquids. This was achieved by making ‘scrambled’ cages from a mixture of commercially available reagents. In both cases, the secret was to avoid functional groups that could penetrate into the molecular cage cavities.

But according to Mastalerz, the surface area and the overall uptake of gases in the porous liquids are still much lower than those in most zeolites and MOFs. ‘At the moment this material cannot compete with those solids,’ he says, adding that permanently porous liquids should instead be seen as a prototype of a new class of substance. ‘Nevertheless, this material bears many advantages because it is a fluid and can for example be pumped through tubing and pipes. This may someday find technological applications in gas separation or transport.’

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemistry World. The article was first published on November 13, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe