New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Local Efforts Can Achieve U.S. Climate Goals Even if Republicans Take Congress, Report Says

A coalition of businesses and local leaders claim that climate progress under the Biden administration will continue if Republicans control the House

Michael Bloomberg at podium with tree projection background

U.S. businessman Michael Bloomberg speaks during a meeting with Earthshot prize winners and finalists at the Glasgow Science Center on the sidelines of the COP26 U.N. Climate Summit on November 2, 2021 in Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The U.S. can still meet its 2030 climate targets if Republicans are victorious on Election Day.

That’s the message behind a new report by America is All In, a coalition of businesses and local leaders working to address rising temperatures.

The analysis shows that expanded state, local and private sector climate actions combined with federal regulations and recently passed legislation would be enough to reach President Joe Biden’s pledge to cut greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“We know we can't count on another major bill passing Congress,” said former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, one of the group’s leaders, on a call with reporters Monday. “We can work towards that. And hopefully, it won't take another two decades for Congress to act. But we can't wait.”

The report was released as Americans cast their votes in midterm elections that are expected to put Republicans in control of the House, a shift in power that promises to complicate the administration's efforts to pursue its climate programs. It also comes as a United Nations global climate conference in Egypt is underway.

The report aims to offer hope that U.S. climate leadership can withstand a Republican takeover of one or both chambers of Congress.

The Inflation Reduction Act that was passed by congressional Democrats this summer would drive the bulk of pre-2030 emissions reductions, according to the report’s 17 authors. It estimates that the climate law will slash U.S. emissions between 37 percent and 42 percent, with a central estimate of 39 percent.

Forthcoming regulations for transportation, electricity, oil and gas and other carbon sources would push emissions reductions farther toward Biden's goal of a 50-52 percent cut by 2030. Actions by states, cities and businesses could then close the gap toward his pledge.

Many of the report’s assumptions about the U.S. decarbonization trajectory are aspirational. For example, a combination of climate law incentives, regulatory compliance costs, state policies and market forces spurs its authors to “assume all existing coal plants retire by 2030.”

While the report seeks to give assurance to the international community that the U.S. target remains within reach, the Biden administration has yet to submit its U.S. National Climate Strategy to the U.N. climate body. The formal report, which was alluded to in multiple submissions to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change last year, would provide a road map for how the U.S. will meet the 50-52 percent commitment.

Asked whether the U.S. would unveil a formal plan, former White House climate adviser Gina McCarthy said, “It's not as simple as one might think.”

“I know that folks have been collaborating with both the domestic climate office as well as with Secretary Kerry's team over at State Department,” McCarthy said on the call organized by America Is All In. “I just don't have information right now about what the timing of that might be.”

She said the strategy would likely incorporate projections from the Inflation Reduction Act, an infrastructure law and a bill to promote U.S. manufacture of semiconductors.

McCarthy, who served as a White House lead during the effort to pass the climate law, expressed “skepticism” that it could be repealed by a Republican-led Congress. And she argued that the climate law's incentives and investments would prove popular in red and blue districts alike.

“I don't think that folks on either side of the party have been missing the opportunity to do ribbon cutting at events and announcements that are being made from the expenditures in the bipartisan infrastructure law,” she said. “And I think you're going to see the same thing” for the climate law.

Reprinted from E&E News with permission from POLITICO, LLC. Copyright 2022. E&E News provides essential news for energy and environment professionals.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe