New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Look Ma, No Junctions! Novel Transistor Design Reemerges After 85 Years

A radically simpler design avoids the standard p-n semiconductor junctions

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The transistors at the heart of every computer, today numbering in the billions on a single chip, have generally been based on the concept John Bardeen, Walter Brattain and William Shockley first turned into a prototype at the Bell Labs in 1947. Physicists have now demonstrated a radically simpler transistor design, first patented by Austrian physicist Julius Edgar Lilienfeld in 1925 but never turned into a practical device until now. This simpler version could push computers to become faster and to consume less power.

In every transistor, an electrode, called the gate, governs whether current can run along a semiconductor strip, thereby defining an on or off state essential to a computer’s binary function. Traditionally, the semiconductor strip is structured like a sandwich, with one type of material between two layers of another type. In the “off” position the sandwich acts as an electrical insulator, but the gate can turn it into a conductor, typically by creating an electric field. In chip fabrication the sandwich is obtained from a strip of silicon “doped” with other elements. For example, the middle section can be created by adding in atoms that tend to hog extra electrons; the side sections get atoms that tend to give electrons away. Each section separately could conduct electricity, but electrons will refuse to move across the middle section unless the gate is turned on.

The boundaries between consecutive sections are called junctions. As transistor size shrinks, it is becoming a challenge to produce sharp boundaries where doping concentrations change abruptly over distances of just nanometers, says Jean-Pierre Colinge of the Tyndall National Institute in Ireland.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A solution, then, is to eliminate those boundaries. Following Lilienfeld’s idea, Colinge and his team have built a transistor with one type of doping only and thus no junctions. The new device is a one-micron-long nanorod of heavily doped silicon, with the gate crossing over its middle section. An electric field from the gate turns the transistor off by depleting that middle section of its electrons, preventing the flow of current through the rod. The team describes its result in the March Nature Nanotechnology (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group).

An effective depletion of electrons requires the rod to be just 10 nanometers thick, a feat that has only recently become possible in large-scale manufacturing. “The device should be able to be integrated in silicon chips quite readily,” because it is compatible with existing fabrication processes, Colinge says. The junctionless design is more effective at switching currents on and off, he says, which means it could work at lower voltages, producing less waste heat, and at faster speeds. (After increasing for decades, computer clock speeds have essentially been stuck at about three gigahertz for the past several years.)

Thomas Theis, director of physical sciences at the IBM Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, N.Y., says that the junctionless transistor could be useful if the authors can make it much shorter than the current one micron, to better match existing components. Colinge says that shrinking it down to 10 nanometers should be feasible, and his team is working on getting there. Since the paper’s publication, Colinge says, several semiconductor companies have shown interest in the transistor, perhaps getting ready to give new meaning to a future that has no boundaries.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe