New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Male Pregnancy May Spur Seahorse Speciation

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


No one could accuse a seahorse of being a hands-off father. That's because males are the ones that carry the young. Now findings published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggest that male pregnancy not only takes the load off female seahorses, it can also drive the development of new species.

Prevailing theory holds that new species arise primarily because geographic barriers halt the flow of genes between different populations. But a number of recent theoretical studies have suggested that so-called sympatric speciation can occur, in which different populations originate in one geographical area, but do not interbreed. In the new work, Adam G. Jones of the Georgia Institute and his colleagues studied seahorses off the coast of Perth, Australia, in which the female deposits her eggs in a male's brood pouch and he fertilizes and carries the eggs until they hatch. Using genetic analyses the researchers confirmed that the creatures tend to choose mates of a similar size (a selection process known as assortative mating). This way, neither female eggs nor male pouch space is wasted. Notes Jones, "in seahorses assortative mating appears to be a consequence of male pregnancy and monogamy."

The researchers then devised a computer model to test whether this mating regime could lead to reproductive isolation and subsequent speciation. They determined that if environmental conditions favor either very small or very large body sizes as opposed to intermediate ones, new species may arise in just tens or hundreds of generations as a result of assortative mating. Male pregnancy, the authors thus conclude, "represents an unusual form of parental care with extraordinary evolutionary consequences."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe