New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Marker Tip—Without Ink!—Makes a Hardy Medical Sampler

The marker material conserved samples for up to a week

Illustration of a tongue with a market drawing on it.

Thomas Fuchs

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Simple swabs and vials play crucial roles in transporting blood, saliva and other fluids during medical lab tests. Samples on cotton swabs dry out rapidly, however, and vials can require an additional transfer step before analysis. Now researchers have found that a felt marker's fibrous tip—without ink, of course—can double as an effective, long-lasting sampler.

Physicist Igor Popov and his team at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology bought replacement tips, designed to hold inks for long periods without drying, that are used in a popular commercial marker. After soaking these highly porous tips in blood or saliva spiked with the painkiller acetaminophen, the researchers successfully tested their MacGyvered samplers to identify the drug and determine its concentration—even after seven days of room temperature storage. Popov says such samplers would work best for tests to detect drugs and hormones that do not break down quickly. “This technology could be utilized for medical investigations in difficult conditions, such as facilities far away from large cities,” he adds. The tool's use is detailed in Acta Astronautica and in Molecules.

Another potential implementation: space travel. Popov says samplers used to test astronauts on the job must be compact, lightweight and usable without intensive training. Samples must also be easily storable for return to Earth; space station astronauts currently use vials that take up valuable freezer space.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The marker idea “is a new application I've never seen for this purpose before,” says University of South Carolina chemist Susan Richardson, who was not involved in the study. She adds that future research should test how long compounds of interest remain viable in bodily fluids such as saliva, which might host microorganisms that degrade them.

Next the researchers will compare various marker types to see which qualities contribute to better sample storage—testing nibs of every composition, shape and size.

Maddie Bender is a science writer and a producer at Hawaii Public Radio. She was a 2021 AAAS Mass Media Fellow at Scientific American.

More by Maddie Bender
Scientific American Magazine Vol 327 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Marker Magic” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 327 No. 1 (), p. 13
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0722-13

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe