New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Mice pull pained expressions

Animal and human faces display similar responses to suffering.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Janelle Weaver

Humans are not the only ones to grimace when they are in pain, scientists have found. Mice show their discomfort in the same way.

Decoding animals' facial expressions may allow researchers and veterinarians to monitor spontaneous pain over long timescales. This may also aid the discovery of painkillers, because this type of pain is similar to that experienced by humans.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Researchers typically detect pain in mice by eliciting specific reactions. Poking the hind paw, for example, causes a mouse to reflexively withdraw the paw; heating the tail makes it flick. But scientists are not agreed on how to measure unprovoked pain.

Grading grimaces

To analyse facial expressions in mice, geneticist Jeffrey Mogil at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, and his colleagues have adapted a coding system used to measure pain in infants. The work is published today in Nature Methods.

Mogil teamed up with Kenneth Craig, a psychologist who studies human pain at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver. Expert expression-spotters from Craig's lab compared video frames of mice filmed for up to 30 minutes before and after receiving a painful injection of acetic acid.

The researchers detected five signs indicative of pain in mice. Three are similar to human responses: the eyes close and the area around them tightens, and the nose and cheeks bulge. Mice also pull back their ears and move their whiskers.

"This is the first study that has examined facial expressions of pain in non-human animals," says Craig.

The mouse grimace scale (MGS) was able to detect pain in experiments typically used by scientists. Grimaces were most pronounced for pain that lasted for a matter of minutes or hours, and for discomfort in joints and internal organs. Superficial harm such as immersing the tail in hot water evoked fewer grimaces. Mice and humans show similar variability in pain response, Mogil says.

Pained expressions differed from those associated with stress and illness, the team found. In addition, more harmful stimuli drew more pronounced grimaces, and pain relievers diminished them.

Mice with a mutation that has been linked to migraines in humans showed pained expressions that subsided when they were given an anti-migraine drug. "I'm very confident that we're measuring pain here," Mogil says.

Universal language?

Lars Arendt-Nielsen, a pain expert at Aalborg University in Denmark, is not convinced that the team has ruled out other emotions, such as fear, but he recognizes the benefits of the approach. "You can probably look into new pain conditions which we have not been capable of looking into with previous methods," he says.

Arendt-Nielsen also questions whether the scale will apply to other animals, because pain reactions differ between species. But Mogil thinks it will. "I'd be incredibly surprised if a version of this scale doesn't work in every mammal," he says.

Next, Mogil would like to compare his method with others used to evaluate painkillers, and test different doses used to treat postoperative discomfort in animals. Currently, it's not known whether prescribed doses really work. "We think in a sense that we can rewrite the veterinarian rule book," he says.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe