New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Michael E. Mann

The famed climatologist talks about how science in the U.S. is under attack

Michael E. Mann is seen walking outside.

Pete Kiehart for the Washington Post via Getty Images

This article is part of “The Young American Scientists,” which includes stories of 28 extraordinary scientists poised to change the world, as well as a deep look at the past, present and future of science and innovation in the U.S.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Michael E. Mann is an American climatologist and geophysicist and a professor at the University of Pennsylvania. His research focuses on climate change and past temperature patterns, including the widely known “hockey stick” reconstruction of historical global temperatures.

[This interview was edited for length and clarity.]

How would you describe the current state of American science?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Fraught. And I should be clear about that—science itself, especially [among] young scientists, is incredibly strong. There are so many great young scientists across the spectrum. But unfortunately, science is under siege. We’re seeing bad actors and political entities trying to suppress science, defund science and create a difficult environment. Scientists need to continue to do great science and communicate its importance to the public and policymakers.

What needs to change in American science?

We need an infrastructure for the defense of science and scientists who are under assault. We need incentives and support—especially for young scientists—to communicate science and be defended against attacks. This responsibility falls on universities, government institutions, scientific societies and the National Academies [of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine].

What gives you optimism right now?

It’s young folks coming into science who are passionate not just about science but about communicating it. I teach Gen Z students, and while they face tremendous anxiety, I see resilience, courage and a willingness to speak truth to power. That gives me hope and energy to continue fighting for science and science‑informed policy.

What’s your best advice for an early‑career scientist?

It’s a challenging time; there’s less financial support and cuts to science agencies. My advice is to focus on learning, doing science and preparing for the future. Have faith that conditions will improve. Don’t be deterred by the challenges.

How has your field changed in the past few years?

Artificial intelligence, big data, machine learning—it’s fundamentally reshaping science and society. It offers tremendous opportunities but also challenges. The key will be leveraging AI without becoming vulnerable to its liabilities.

Andrea Thompson is senior editor for Earth and environment at Scientific American, covering the environment, energy and Earth sciences. She has been covering these topics for nearly two decades. Prior to joining Scientific American, she was a senior writer covering climate science at Climate Central and a reporter and editor at Live Science, where she primarily covered earth science and the environment. She has moderated panels, including as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Media Zone, and appeared in radio and television interviews on major networks. She holds a graduate degree in science, health and environmental reporting from New York University, as well as a B.S. and an M.S. in atmospheric chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Follow Thompson on Bluesky @andreatweather.bsky.social

More by Andrea Thompson

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe