Model Predicts Future Heat Waves Will be More Intense

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Last year's hot weather in France made August miserable for most citizens and claimed thousands of lives. Climate modeling results published today in the journal Science indicate that heat waves at the end of the 21st century will be more severe, more frequent and longer lasting than those of recent years.

Gerald Meehl and Claudia Tebaldi of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) utilized the Parallel Climate Model to investigate the behavior of future heat waves. ¿Extreme weather events will have some of the most severe impacts on human society as climate changes,¿ Meehl remarks. The researchers ran the model for both the 20th century, using data from 1961 to 1990, and the 21st, predicting events for 2080 to 2099, assuming little in the way of policy intervention for greenhouse gas emissions.

Using Paris and Chicago as focal points for Europe and North America, respectively, the team determined that the atmospheric circulation pattern seen during heat waves is likely to become more pronounced as greenhouse gas concentrations rise. For example, heat events in Chicago currently last between 5.39 and 8.85 days, but the new findings indicate that they will stretch to between 8.5 and 9.24 days in the future. Paris, meanwhile, might experience heat waves lasting up to 17 days instead of between eight and 12. ¿This study provides significant insight into the complex response of global climate to possible future worldwide economic and regulatory policies,¿ comments Cliff Jacobs, atmospheric science program director for the National Science Foundation (NSF). ¿The societal implications of this study need to be further explored.¿

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American