More on That Polar Vortex Thing

Yes, we were cold, but others were warm.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Yes, we were cold, but others were warm.

Now We Know What a Polar Vortex Is, but Do We?

If someone had told me a couple of weeks ago that “polar vortex” (also called a “polar low”) would become a household name, I would have thought they were crazy. But for a few days this past week, with its record-breaking deep freeze* over large swaths of the Midwest, Northeast and even parts of the South, the “polar vortex” was a main topic of conversation around town and topped many a headline and newscast. A Google search on “polar vortex” brought me 17 million hits. It was quite an event.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Now, as the polar vortex weakens and moves on toward Europe — and those of us who experienced the system thankfully look forward to balmier weather this weekend, if we are so lucky — let’s pause to look back on just how much the vortex torqued temperatures over our part of the globe.

Some Got It Cold, Some Got It Hot

The graphic below shows the global distribution of temperature anomalies (the temperature excursion from the average for that day and location) on January 7. Note the dark blue and purple colors blanketing the eastern half of the United States — it was cold.

But there’s another feature of this figure that has perhaps not been stressed enough. Note the green, yellow, and even red colors over Alaska, eastern Canada, and northern Europe. While many of us Americans were in a deep freeze, our neighbors to the north as well as in Europe were, at least figuratively, baking in the oven.

It’s the Weather, Stupid

The weather this past week wasn’t just about cold temperatures; it was about cold temperatures in one place and warm ones in another.

Despite what some, like the DonaldRush Limbaugh, and others have been saying, the event we experienced last week wasn’t a sign of global cooling. It was indicative of heat being redistributed. And that’s not unusual; it’s what the atmosphere does.

Much of the weather we experience — the rain and the cold and the hot and the dry — is generated by the atmosphere acting as a heat engine, moving heat from the tropics to the polar regions. The polar vortex is simply an example of the atmosphere working very hard and fast at that redistribution thing. The good news, at least so far, is that this type of polar vortex excursion is not the norm.  Some speculate that global warming will make them more common; see herehere and here, for example. Let’s hope they’re wrong.

___________________

End Note

* Low temperature records were broken in various places (e.g., New York City, Maine, Chicago) from January 5 through January 7 but there were no all-time record lows.

Further Reading

Polar Vortex Enters Northern U.S.
NASA, January 6, 2014

What’s going on with the Polar Vortex?
NOAA, January 6, 2014

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe