These Hormones Drive Bloodlust in Mosquitoes

Mosquitoes carry a pair of hormones, one of which drives bloodlust while the other signals satiation, scientists say

Close-up of an Aedes aegypti mosquito

Joao Paulo Burini/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A pair of hormones work in tandem to activate or suppress mosquitoes’ cravings for blood, according to a study published today.

The findings reveal a possible mechanism for what drives mosquitoes’ attraction to people and other animals, which has remained a mystery until now. “The discovery could provide new pesticide targets for preventing mosquito reproduction and disease transmission,” says Zhen Zou, an entomologist at the Chinese Academy of Science’s Institute of Zoology in Beijing.

The females of most mosquito species — including Aedes aegypti, the carrier of the viruses that cause dengue fever, yellow fever and zika — feed on animal blood for the development of their eggs. But once they’ve eaten a blood meal, their appetite for blood shuts down until after they lay their eggs.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Michael Strand, an entomologist at the University of Georgia in Athens, wanted to better understand the mechanism that controls this cycle of attraction. He noticed that the levels of a hormone produced in the insect gut called neuropeptide F (NPF) spiked when mosquitoes were seeking a host and disappeared after they feasted on blood. “That motivated us to look at whether this hormone’s presence was a driving factor in seeking a blood meal,” says Strand.

With his colleagues, Strand analysed mosquito enteroendocrine cells, which produce hormones in the gastrointestinal tract. As expected, NPF levels skyrocketed before mosquitoes had a blood meal and fell six hours after they fed. The mosquitoes’ attraction to humans matched this hormonal swing: they showed no interest in a human hand on the day of their meal, but made a beeline for it after they had laid their eggs. “There was this almost perfect mirror image,” says Strand.

Next, the researchers knocked down the gene that produces NPF in female mosquitoes and found that it reduced their attraction to humans. When they injected the hormone into these mutant mosquitoes, it restored their interest in humans but had little effect on mosquitoes that were carrying eggs.

The team also found that certain neurons that reach into the gut produced another hormone called RYamide, which regulates feeding behaviour in insects. Just as NPF levels dropped after a blood meal, RYamide levels increased. In mosquitoes without eggs, an injection of RYamide reduced their NPF levels and suppressed their attraction to human hosts, whereas the control mosquitoes — with natural hormone levels — zipped towards a human hand. This suggests that NPF and RYamide work together to stimulate and suppress host attraction in mosquitoes.

Strand and his colleagues plan to investigate other molecular factors that are involved in host attraction to build a more complete picture. “Life is never simple,” he says.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on July 1, 2024.

Gemma Conroy is a freelance science journalist based in Sydney, Australia.

More by Gemma Conroy

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe