New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Moths Inspire Antireflective Coating that Could Help Devices Capture Light

A plastic film that mimics the microsized lenses in the compound eye of a moth could help boost solar cell efficiency and sharpen image sensors' views

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A new antireflective coating inspired by the compound lenses in moth eyes could help boost the efficiency of solar cells and sharpen the view of image sensors. Using a simple method to stamp patterned lenses over large areas, researchers in Singapore have come up with a process that could make manufacturing such coatings easier (ACS Nano 2015, DOI: 10.1021/nn5051272).

Antireflective coatings help solar cells collect as much of the sun’s light as possible, boosting the power output. But typically, these thin-film coatings work best at preventing the reflection of a specific wavelength of light, hitting perpendicular to the surface. They don’t catch light of different wavelengths, coming in at other angles. Layering films of different materials of varying thicknesses yields more absorptive coatings, but that approach is expensive and difficult to do over large areas, says Peng Jiang, a chemical engineer at theUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, who was not involved with the work.

Nature provides an alternative design strategy for an affordable, broadband antireflective coating. Nocturnal moths navigate under the dim light of the moon and stars thanks to eyes made of arrays of microsized lenses called ommatidia, which are further patterned with dome-shaped nanostructures. This hierarchical design reduces reflection and also prevents water from beading up on the creatures’ eyes. But re-creating such a design in the lab, by using moth eyes as tiny stamps or by plasma etching, has proved laborious. Although this earlier research has shown that the designs are useful, the methods are not compatible with large-scale manufacturing, says Hemant Kumar Raut of Singapore University of Technology & Design.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


To solve this problem, Raut and Mohammad S. M. Saifullah of the Agency for Science, Technology & Research, in Singapore, turned to nanoimprint lithography, a method for stamping high-resolution, nanoscale patterns over large areas. To create a reusable stamp, Raut and Saifullah first made two sets of nickel molds, one patterned with 200-nm-diameter domes and one with microlenses 2 to 25 μm in diameter. The researchers then used these molds to pattern films of polycarbonate. First they stamped the nanodomes and protected that pattern by spinning a thin coating of a sacrificial polymer on top. Afterwards, they stamped the larger microlenses. Finally, they washed away the sacrificial polymer, leaving a polycarbonate microlens array.

The researchers then tested the moth-inspired arrays, comparing them with microlens arrays without the nanodomes, to see how much light they reflected. From 400 to 1,000 nm in wavelength, the moth-inspired arrays reflected just 4.8% of light, compared with 8.7% reflected by the simple microlenses. When they varied the incident angle of the light, the nanodome-decorated arrays continued to perform about twice as well. The nanodomes also repelled water, which could help keep solar cells clean.

The antireflective coatings perform impressively, says Jiang, who is also making bioinspired antireflective coatings. Jiang says the Singapore group now needs to demonstrate that these methods can scale up to make coatings square meters in size. Saifullah says he’s currently adapting the imprinting technique to a roller printer that should be able to pattern large areas at high speeds.

This article is reproduced with permission from Chemical & Engineering News (© American Chemical Society). The article was first published on February 27, 2015.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe