Mouth Wide Open: The Challenge of Studying Deep-Sea Creatures

An aquatic scientist describes the challenges of studying creatures that live deep under the sea

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Name: Christopher P. Kenaley
Title: Postdoctoral research associate, University of Washington
Location: Seattle

I work on deepwater fishes—species that live anywhere below 200 to 3,000 meters deep in the ocean. The ones that I study, loosejaw dragonfishes, dwell about a kilometer down, in an area called the midwater zone. They have no skin between the two bones that form their lower jaw. This is unique to vertebrates. You might look at this animal and think, “How on earth could it possibly consume anything?” Say you had a natural history museum specimen in your hand, and you put a little tiny food fish in its mouth. You would watch it fall right out.

The deep sea is the largest ecosystem on earth, but we know very little about it. Dragonfishes are the dominant predators of this ecosystem, and they have features similar to those of most predatory fishes in the deep sea: they have long jaws and huge fangs. We hope to learn how predators of the earth’s largest ecosystem feed.
The interesting question is, Why have this loosejaw morphology?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


I’m working on how these jaws perform using computer models. In January I’ll begin a postdoctoral research fellowship at Harvard, where I’ll be transitioning from the theoretical to building robots of these jaws. We’ll start with micro CT data from museum specimens. The micro CT machine hits the specimen with radiation, taking x-ray images in very thin slices—smaller than the micron level—that software can stack into a 3-D computer model. We’ll send that model to a 3-D printer that works much like the software does, printing thin slices of composite material to make a plastic model of the fish’s skull. We can then add material that will act as muscles, skin and tendons.

We could study dragonfishes in a lab if we could reproduce the conditions in which these fishes live: the pressure, the temperature and the low light. But to maintain these conditions in a lab is very, very difficult.

Perhaps the most challenging proposition to an animal living in the deep sea is the scarcity of available food. I hope this work will uncover how predators cope with scarcity and what physical features and behaviors are important in capturing prey in this barren seascape.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 305 Issue 2This article was published with the title “Mouth Wide Open: The Challenge of Studying Deep-Sea Creatures” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 305 No. 2 ()
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican082011-5Ok0zUTokt1crAzYEOSXua

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe