New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Mutation Makes Rats More Sensitive to Alcohol's Effects

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Alcohol has been a drink of choice for people for thousands of years, but scientists still do not know just how the stuff affects brain function when people become intoxicated. New research reveals that genetic change in a single nucleotide is enough to heighten alcohol sensitivity in rats and could help scientists design novel therapeutic approaches for alcoholism.

Researchers from the University of California at Los Angeles led by H. Jacob Hanchar and Paul D. Dodson tested how rats reacted to varying doses of alcohol. The team tested animals that had a naturally occurring gene mutation--a single nucleotide difference that in turn changes one amino acid in the receptor proteins for GABA neurotransmitters--and compared them to rats without the mutation. After imbibing, the animals performed a balancing task and underwent blood-alcohol testing. The animals with the mutation fell off a rolling log much sooner than the control animals did, which suggests that the mutation left them much less tolerant to alcohol's effects. Although the blood-alcohol levels of the mutants (which were equivalent to those of the control animals) indicated that they should have been slightly intoxicated , their behavior was significantly more impaired.

GABA receptors in humans and rats are very similar and the fact that the mutation occurs naturally suggests that people, too, may be genetically predisposed to be hypersensitive to alcohol's effects. Study co-author Thomas Otis notes that the findings could guide researchers in their quest to develop new drugs for treating alcohol addiction or for acute cases of alcohol poisoning. The findings appear online today in the journal Nature Neuroscience.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe