New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

NASA images reveal 60-foot-wide crater on moon left by SpaceX rocket

The SpaceX rocket fragment hit the moon at several times the speed of sound on August 5

An animated before-and-after view of the crater formed after a Falcon 9 upper stage struck the moon’s surface on August 5, 2026.

An animated before-and-after view of the crater formed after a Falcon 9 upper stage struck the moon’s surface on August 5, 2026.

NASA Goddard/Intuitive Machines

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The moon officially has a new crater. On August 5 the upper stage of a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket smacked into the face of our natural satellite at an estimated 5,400 miles an hour—several times the speed of sound. Astronomers predicted the crash would cause a plume of debris to rise up from the moon, leaving a crater behind for posterity. And now we can see the damage for ourselves.

On August 11 and 12 NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) spotted the crater and snapped pictures from around 60 miles above the lunar surface. The crater is around 60 feet in width and less than 10 feet in depth. In the images, bright rays can be seen emanating from the crater's rim—these are likely material from deep below the surface, blasted up by the rocket fragment as it hit the moon.

Collected between August 11 and 12 by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter six days after a Falcon 9 upper-stage booster impacted the moon, these images were taken from different viewing angles, bringing out different features.

Collected between August 11 and 12 by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter six days after a Falcon 9 upper-stage booster impacted the moon, these images were taken from different viewing angles, bringing out different features.

NASA Goddard/Intuitive Machines


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The LRO is not the only telescope to see the impact and its aftermath—the European Southern Observatory previously announced that its Very Large Telescope had detected sodium and lithium in the debris cloud thrown up by the crash. And a South Korean lunar orbiter also previously spotted the crater.

The Falcon 9 upper stage was never supposed to hit the moon. The four-metric-ton (4.4-ton) vehicle was meant to burn up in Earth's atmosphere after successfully launching two lunar landers in January 2025. But that didn't happen. Instead, it entered orbit around Earth at about the same distance as the moon, putting it on a collision course with our natural satellite. An amateur astronomer, Bill Gray, spotted the rocket fragment in September of that year. Since then, astronomers around the world watched the object as it neared its demise.

Tracking such pieces of space junk is hard. NASA's Center for Near Earth Object Studies traces space rocks such as asteroids in our vicinity, and the U.S. Space Surveillance Network keeps tabs on errant spacecraft and some debris. But most space junk particles are too small to be tracked.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe