New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

NASA Satellite Catches Star's Death by Black Hole

The Swift telescope has charted a star's plunge into a supermassive black hole at the core of a distant galaxy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A star's long-ago death dive into a black hole generated cosmic fireworks that are revealing more and more about the dramatic encounter. 

The star got too close to its galaxy's central black hole about 290 million years ago, and collisions among its torn-apart pieces caused an eruption of optical, ultraviolet and X-ray light that was first spotted by scientists in 2014.

Fresh observations of this radiation by NASA's Swift telescope have yielded more details about where these different wavelengths were generated in the event, which is called ASASSN-14li, a new study reports. [The Stranges Black Holes in the Universe]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"We discovered brightness changes in X-rays that occurred about a month after similar changes were observed in visible and UV light," study lead author Dheeraj Pasham, an astrophysicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said in a NASA statement. "We think this means the optical and UV emission arose far from the black hole, where elliptical streams of orbiting matter crashed into each other."

The doomed star harbored about the same mass as Earth's sun, making it no match for the 3-million-solar-mass black hole that it encountered, NASA officials said. Tidal forces within the black hole overcame the star's gravity, tearing the star apart into a debris stream. 

Next, the debris from this star formed a spinning accretion disk, with the matter compressing and heating before falling into the black hole

The new research suggests that interactions among the debris could generate the optical and UV emission. That's because the debris falling into the black hole at first overshoots it, zinging back out in an elliptical orbit and colliding with incoming pieces, study team members said.

This helps clarify earlier work, which shows that UV and optical wavelengths appeared to be located far from where the black hole's tidal influence would destroy the star.

"Returning clumps of debris strike the incoming stream, which results in shock waves that emit visible and ultraviolet light," said acting Swift principal investigator and study co-author Bradley Cenko, of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. "As these clumps fall down to the black hole, they also modulate the X-ray emission there."

The new study was published last week in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Copyright 2017 SPACE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Editor's Recommendations

Elizabeth Howell (she/her), Ph.D., is a staff writer in the spaceflight channel since 2022 covering diversity, education and gaming as well. She was contributing writer for Space.com for 10 years before joining full-time.

More by Elizabeth Howell

SPACE.com is the premier source of space exploration, innovation and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.

More by SPACE.com

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe