New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

NASA’s Artemis II astronauts may catch a comet—if it can survive the sun

Amid a journey of celestial spectacles, the Artemis II astronauts may spot a comet—if it survives a dash past the sun

A comet with a fuzzy cloud of gas and dust.

A view of Comet MAPS captured by the James Webb Space Telescope on February 7.

NASA/ESA/CSA/JWST MIRI/Qicheng Zhang et al. (image); Melina Thévenot (image processing) (CC BY-SA 4.0)

NASA has launched four astronauts on a pioneering journey around the moon—the Artemis II mission. Follow our coverage here.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The cosmos may have a special treat in store for the four astronauts of NASA’s Artemis II mission.

NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen will be the first humans to see the far side of the moon with their own eyes since the Apollo era when they fly past our companion over the course of a few hours on Monday. But they may also catch sight of a remarkable comet out the window of their Orion capsule. That comet, formally known as Comet C/2026 A1 (MAPS), was the very first one astronomers discovered this year. Now it’s racing toward the sun for a close approach on Saturday that will potentially spark a remarkable spectacle—if the comet can take the heat.

“Over the next few days, the comet is going to be experiencing the most hostile environment our solar system has to offer, and it will suffer accordingly,” says Karl Battams, a space scientist at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. He’s also the principal investigator of the Sungrazer Project, a NASA-funded crowdsourced science initiative named for the comets it seeks—“sungrazers” that approach within 850,000 miles (1.37 million kilometers) of the sun. Sifting through data from sun-gazing spacecraft, Battams’s project has found more than 5,000 so far.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Comet MAPS wasn’t one of them, however. Instead MAPS was discovered on January 13 by a quartet of amateur astronomers—Alain Maury, Georges Attard, Daniel Parrott and Florian Signoret, hence the MAPS acronym—using a remotely operated telescope high in Chile’s Atacama Desert.

The comet’s closest solar approach will occur on April 4, when it will zip within 101,100 miles (162,700 kilometers) of our star. By comparison, that’s almost 40 times closer than the spacecraft record holder, NASA’s Parker Solar Probe, which zipped within about four million miles of the sun (nearly 6.5 million kilometers) on Christmas Eve in 2024. And Parker only withstood that scorching experience thanks to its meticulously engineered heat shield.

Whether Comet MAPS will survive is far from guaranteed—most sungrazers do not, says Quanzhi Ye, a planetary astronomer at the University of Maryland and Boston University.

Helping the comet’s odds is its relatively large size, with an icy core that is some 1,300 feet (400 meters) across, according to recent observations by the James Webb Space Telescope. But this size is only an estimate, and it’s changing all the time: a comet’s brightness comes from light reflecting off gas and dust ejected from its icy core, which shrinks the object as it basks in the sun’s rays.

That’s already happening on Comet MAPS, even days away from its brush with the sun. “It seems to be quite active—actually, a little bit more active than we’d like,” Ye says. In a worst-case scenario, this activity could cause the comet to break apart even before it reaches its closest point to the sun, a moment scientists call perihelion.

“My best guess is that it will disintegrate rapidly over the next couple of days, leaving nothing but a faint cloud of dust to recede from the sun,” Battams says.

Right now the comet is difficult to monitor because of its proximity to our star. Human eyes are not built to look at the sun directly—especially not through a telescope. And although specialized solar spacecraft can spot objects so close to the fierce stellar glare, none that are now flying can produce a high-resolution view of the tiny comet.

So scientists must simply wait and see. But in the unlikely scenario in which the comet endures not just perihelion but also its subsequent solar retreat in the following days, Comet MAPS will soar back into view, giving the crew of Artemis II a unique opportunity to glimpse it in all its glory. During Monday’s lunar flyby, the moon will be between the Orion capsule and the sun, blotting out its retina-burning light so that MAPS’s fainter glow can be safely seen. The result could be spectacular, Ye says. Even if the chances are slim, it’s one more reason to look forward to Monday’s events.

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe