New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

NASA shuts down one of Voyager 1’s instruments to try keep the spacecraft alive

This iconic spacecraft launched nearly 49 years ago and is running perilously low on power

An artist's depiction of a Voyager spacecraft in outer space.

NASA/JPL-Caltech

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The venerable Voyager 1 spacecraft is one step closer to the end of its scientific road.

NASA turned off one of its three remaining operational instruments last Friday to save power after the spacecraft’s energy levels unexpectedly dropped during a maneuver in late February, according to a statement from the agency.

“While shutting down a science instrument is not anybody’s preference, it is the best option available,” said Kareem Badaruddin, Voyager mission manager at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, in the statement. “The team remains focused on keeping both Voyagers going for as long as possible.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Voyager 1 and its twin, Voyager 2, launched in 1977 on a grand tour of the outer solar system. Voyager 1 zipped past Jupiter, Saturn and the latter planet’s largest moon, Titan, all within just a few years after its launch. And ever since, it has been pushing the bounds of human exploration beyond the solar system. The spacecraft is currently 15.78 billion miles away from Earth and traveling at more than 51,000 miles per hour.

But the journey has taken a toll on the spacecraft’s nuclear power supply, which no longer generates nearly as much juice as when the probe first launched. Ever since the late 1980s, NASA has been sunsetting each Voyager spacecraft’s science instruments one by one to reduce the amount of power required to remain operational—and last Friday another device on Voyager 1 shut down for good.

That instrument, the Low-Energy Charged Particles (LECP) experiment, measured particles, including ions, electrons and cosmic rays. Its data have helped scientists understand pressure fronts and other structures within the interstellar medium that fills the void beyond the edge of the solar system.

NASA engineers long ago came up with the order in which instruments on the twin spacecraft would be turned off as they aged and lost power. Before this month, Voyager 1’s last instrument loss came in February 2025, when engineers turned off its cosmic ray subsystem experiment. Voyager 2 lost its LECP experiment shortly after; it currently has three operational science instruments.

Now Voyager 1 is gathering data with only its magnetometer and its plasma wave subsystem. Given the spacecraft’s current power supply, NASA expects it will be able to operate in this configuration for about a year. During that time, the space agency will be working to fine-tune a plan called the “Big Bang,” which is designed to help both Voyager spacecraft save energy and extend their operations. That procedure will be tested on Voyager 2 beginning next month.

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe