New Alloy

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In examining some silver ore from South America, at the government office in Paris, one piece was noticed, which, from appearance, was supposed to be exceedingly pure. However, to be quite certain, the examiner tried it, and from the resistance offered to the cutting tool, judged it to be 750 thousandths. The assay, however, gave as its purity 994 thousands, so that 6 thousands, only, of foreign materials sufficed to give it this resistance without depriving ifc of its malleability. From specimens of the same that were assayed, there were given, in analysis, 3 thousands of iron, 2 thousandths of cobalt, and thousandth ol nickel. The chemist, M. Barruel, who made the analysis, has been experimenting with the same alloy in diff erent proportions, and obtained the most perfect result, by mixing these three metals in equal parts. As there is no account of a similar alloy in any chemical work, he thinks that it might be profitably employed for various purposes, such as faucets of particular kinds, or medals where a more durable metal is required for the relief than what is generally employed as well as for many other uses. The afeove is translated from the proceedings of the French Academy of Sciences for the month of December last.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 18This article was published with the title “New Alloy” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 18 (), p. 142
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01151853-142a

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe