New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

New Assay Test Exposes Tiny Pockets of Drug-Resistant HIV in the Blood

Detection technique may pave the way for a more tailored treatment that delays the onset of drug resistance

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A new type of test may markedly improve the ability to detect potentially drug-resistant HIV infections using a patient's blood sample. The technique works by scanning individual virus molecules for genetic mutations that are known to confer immunity to existing treatments.

Although the test still has to prove it can benefit large numbers of patients and work in a real-world setting, "this to me looks faster, cheaper and easier" than existing assays for HIV drug resistance, says HIV/AIDS researcher Douglas Richman of the University of California, San Diego, who was not involved in the research. "So it may be a significant improvement."

In general, drug resistance occurs when some fraction of the viruses or bacteria causing an infection are immune to a drug. (Researchers do not know the minimum amount for HIV.) As a result, instead of eradicating the infection, the drug neutralizes the sensitive pathogens and allows the resistant ones to multiply, rendering the treatment ineffective.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the U.S. and Europe, 10 to 20 percent of new HIV infections carry at least one drug-resistant mutation. Researchers have therefore developed assays to identify populations of resistant viruses in a patient's blood. Existing commercial assays may fail to spot the potential for drug resistance, however, because they can only detect resistant viruses if they make up 20 percent or more of those in a sample.

"Sooner or later [HIV patients] are going to generate enough resistant virus to make the patient fail the treatment," says Feng Gao of Duke University Medical Center, leader of the group that developed the new assay. "If you choose the drugs wisely, you can delay the resistance."

The test that Gao and his colleagues designed can spot drug-resistant HIV at levels of 0.1 to 0.01 percent, they report in this month's Nature Methods. In principle, the assay should be able to scan a single sample for all 30 or so known resistance mutations, says Gao, whose group hopes to start a company to commercialize the technology by 2009.

The researchers smeared each of 13 test samples from HIV-positive individuals on to its own polymer gel, which held the sample's virus particles in place. Next, they introduced a short piece of DNA that attached to the virus's genetic material adjacent to where a particular drug-resistant mutation would occur. To distinguish resistant from sensitive strains, they added two additional units of DNA (called bases), each labeled with a fluorescent marker of a different color. A resistant strain would incorporate one of the bases, making its location on the gel glow one color; a drug-sensitive strain would take up the other base and glow another color.

The researchers were able to repeat the assay on the same virus particles but for different drug-resistance mutations, in essence allowing them to identify individual viruses resistant to multiple drugs, they report.

For the time being, Richman says, "it's not going to replace any of the commercial assays right now because they are high-throughput," meaning they can be performed rapidly and at low cost. "From a research tool that looks very promising to a commercially viable assay there's a lot steps."

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe