New Discovery

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Within two years we find that several American inventions and discoveries have been appropriated by our brethren across the A tlantic. Among these is one for the manufacture of gas from wood, stubble, straw, etc., which is supposed to be a cheaper method than the same made from coal, oils, rosin, Ic Although I am willing to award credit to the genius of English inventors, and am ready to praise a Watts and an Arkwright, yet I am unwilling to see my own countrymen robbed of their just merits and inventions. Within the last year or so a patent has been issued by the United States for an improvement in making tar, charcoal, gas, etc., from wood. This invention not only embraces the above enumerated productions, but by an ingenious and simple arrangement, collects all the products ot the wood, such as acetic acid, pyrox-yHc spirits, creosote, etc. The whole thilg appeared in a practical form previous to any claim by the English, and the enterprismg among the oldest residents of Wilmington have new in process of erection an establishment to manufacture wood gas, or pyroligne-ous gas, to illuminate their streets and houses. In this respect North Carolina has been wide awake, and proves hersel! something more than the "Rip Van Winkle of the South." Her unfailing 10rests may yet drive from the market the coal of England for gas, for it may not be known that even in this city English coal lights it up. The pine forests of North Carolina, which have been exhausted of their turpentine, the pine straw all over the grounds, a nd pine saw-dust are the articles which can be made available for lightilg our cities cheaply, and the other articles produced by the destructive distillation of wood, such as charcoal, tar, acids, w ood naphtha, etc., will more than pay all expens e s and bring the i l luminating gas down to a m e re song.-LNa-' tIonal Intelligencer. [The National Intelligencer has certainly been made the subject of a light joke. It has long been known to every chemist that bodies containing carbon and hydrogen possess the constituent elements of gas illumination. The economy of any substance for making gas consists in the amount of carbon and hydrogen in the proper quantities for making good light contained in it according to its bulk and weight. Wood, straw, and stubble, are just about as suitable for makllg gas as cork is for ship building.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 22This article was published with the title “New Discovery” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 22 (), p. 170
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican02121853-170b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe