New Fire-Engine Trial

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


MESSRS EDITORS—As many of your readers are interested in fire-engine matters, I send you an account of the performance of a new engine in this place. It was built for Ocean Engine Co., No. 3, by William Jeffers, Pawtucket, R. I. This engine has 10-inch cylinders, and 10-inch stroke. After the parade on the 7th inst. she was tried, with the following result:—Drawing her own water, and playing through 400 feet of hose, she threw a good solid stream 184 feet perpendicularly. This, for a new engine, manned by a new company, (many of them never having been on the brakes beforej), certainly speaks well for it. E. A. H. Springfield, Mass., November, 1857. [This certainly was a good performance, as 130 feet perpendicular hight, out of 100 feet of hose, is held to be excellent playing.—EDS.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 13 Issue 12This article was published with the title “New Fire-Engine Trial” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 13 No. 12 (), p. 91
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican11281857-91b

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe