New Locomotive

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A locomotive ot a new description has been lately patented by Messrs. Remsen amp; Hutton of Troy, N. Y., a working model of which is now on exhibition at No. 6 Wall street. An account of this invention was given some time back, in the Scientific American, as will be seen by referring to page 260, Vol. 7, under the head of New Inventions. The theory propounded by the patentees is, iat the steam is more effectually employed in moving the crank during what is oiten termed the upper part of its revolution, than when it assumes the position beliw the horizontal. Or, in other words, they employ the power transmitted from the piston to pull the crank, but not to push it, so that the movement of each piston is effectual only when travelling in the same direction as the train. To attain this end, the patentees employ the single action principle, admiiting the steam to only one end of the piston. Of course either can be used, as it is necessary at times to reverse the engine, but, as a rule, the steam is admitted only above the piston, which they consider to realize a greater percentage of the power. Three cylinders are employed, one for each driving-wheel, and a third, which is situated between the other two acts on the axle, an arrangement that is, in reality, equivalent to a three-throw crank, the nature of which is well understood by all locomotive engineers.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 19This article was published with the title “New Locomotive” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 19 (), p. 150
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican01221853-150d

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe