New Process for Obtaining Carburetted Hydrogen Gas from Tar

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The extensive proJHBHf carburetted hy drogen gas from coal or roMrrar, or other like substances, has been thought by many good chemist8tobe quite impracticable, one of the difficulties to be overcome is that of obtaining a retort so constructed that the coal tar, which is made to enter it in fluid form, will not coo it sufficiently to destroy the product, and cause an incrustation of the tar upon the sides of the retort. This difficulty has been obviated by Stephen Meredith, of Erie, Pa. Mr. Meredith has constructed a novel retort for the accomplishment of the object above stated. It is so formed that a heated surface is constantly presented to the fluid tar. This is effected by placing within the retoit, longitu dinally, a cylinder which may be made to revolve in bearings, working in stuffing boxes, to prevent the escape of the gas lrom the retort. A pipe or tube passes longitudinally into the retort and over the entire length of the cylinder, the portion of the tube within the retort being perforated to permit the fluid tar, which enters the retort through the pipe to fall upon the cylinder. As the cylinder revolves it constantly presents a new surface to the heated retort, thus the tar is prevented from forming incrustations and burning on the sides ot the retort,but is readily converted into gas. Measures have been taken by the inventor to obtain a patent.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 35This article was published with the title “New Process for obtaining carburetted Hydrogen Gas from Tar” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 35 (), p. 276
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican05141853-276e

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe