New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

New Protein Fights Superbugs by Boosting Immune System

When antibiotics have lost their oomph, kick the immune system up a notch.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

How do you fight deadly bacteria that shrug off modern antibiotics? Simple: juice up the immune system to fight its own battles. Researchers have come up with a new compound that activates the immune system's first line of defense. Mice that received the chemical were less likely to succumb to drug-resistant staph or other infections. The group speculates that the drug could make such infections receptive to antibiotics again.

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria sicken about two million people and kill 90,000 every year in North America, says immunologist Robert Hancock of the University of British Columbia. Among the most dangerous are vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which are difficult to treat with common antibiotics. Looking for new ways to attack these so-called superbugs, Hancock studied a group of short proteins, or peptides, that in high concentrations can kill bacteria.

Concerned that the peptides might trigger sepsis, a potentially lethal condition brought on by bacteria in the bloodstream, Hancock administered them to infected mice. "What we found, in contrast, was they actually reverse sepsis," he says. The only trouble was that they also caused allergylike reactions and killed healthy intestinal cells. So he and his colleagues engineered shorter peptides that they hoped would prevent sepsis without causing other complications.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


They hit on a 13-amino-acid peptide, which they call an innate defense regulator (IDR-1). To test it out, they injected mice with IDR-1 either one to two days before or four hours after infecting them with VRE, MRSA or Salmonella. The treated mice were nearly twice as likely to survive infection, the group reports this week in Nature Biotechnology.

Hancock, who co-founded a company to commercialize IDR-1, says the peptide does not kill bacteria directly. Instead it seems to prime the body's quick and dirty immune response, called innate immunity. A subsequent infection, he says, may then flag the body to send a surplus of white blood cells called monocytes and macrophages to gobble up invading pathogens, but fewer of the more aggressive neutrophils, which are more likely to induce sepsis.

Hancock says that clinical trials of IDR-1 could begin in 12 to 15 months. He adds that preliminary evidence suggests that the peptide can enhance the effectiveness of antibiotics in mice, even against superbugs such as VRE.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe