New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Newly discovered carnivorous plant is as deceptive as it is deadly

Charles Darwin predicted in 1875 that some members of the Saxifraga genus could be carnivorous—now scientists have finally proven him right

Yellow flowers.

This unassuming yellow-flowered plant can trap, digest and take nutrients from insect prey, scientists just found.

Xin-Jian Zhang/Nature Communications

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A small, yellow-flowered plant that grows in the mountainous forests of China may not look intimidating. But beneath its bright exterior, Saxifraga candelabrum is hiding a bloodthirsty secret.

This plant species is carnivorous, which means it can attract, trap and digest insect prey and absorb their nutrients. Through a lengthy process of observation, genetic analysis and a fruit fly feast, scientists “left no stones unturned” to prove the plant has a hidden taste for flesh, says Mark Chase, a botanist at England’s Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, who was not involved in the research.

“Most papers cover only one or two aspects of the carnivorous syndrome, but this study does it all, from observations in the field to isotope work and genomics in the lab,” Chase says.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The discovery supports a 150-year-old hypothesis from the father of evolutionary biology: Charles Darwin predicted in 1875 that some members of the Saxifraga genus could be carnivorous. Though the species he predicted are distinct from S. candelabrum, they share microscopic hairs on their surface. Darwin based his prediction on those hairs, S. candelabrum uses them to trap insects.

Most other carnivorous plants have “highly specialized trapping structures,” says Hang Sun, lead author of the paper and a botanist at the Kunming Institute of Botany at the Chinese Academy of Sciences. This species’ tiny, sticky traps offer a new example of how carnivorous plants might function.

“The discovery of Saxifraga candelabrum reminds us that many inconspicuous carnivorous plants, or plants with partial carnivorous traits, may still exist in nature,” he says.

After observing S. candelabrum plants trapping insects in their natural habitat, the researchers analyzed the plants’ genetic makeup and found similarities to other carnivorous species. They also fed fruit flies to the plants and identified a digestive enzyme that absorbs the insects’ nitrogen. The study was published on Tuesday in Nature Communications.

The discovery of a new carnivorous species is “definitely not an everyday thing,” says Qianshi Lin, a biologist at Lakehead University in Ontario, who was not directly involved in the research but peer-reviewed the study before publication. The last carnivorous plant discovery was announced almost five years ago. Broader genetic understanding of these plants, Lin says, could be “important for the future of agriculture” because transferring certain genes from carnivorous plants into crops could provide a natural pesticide.

The “transformation from prey to predator is a striking adaptive innovation,” the authors write in the study. But exactly how plants evolve to be carnivorous remains a mystery. Answering this question, Chase says, is the next step in the world of these unassuming, murderous plants.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe