New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Next Supercontinent 'Amasia' Will Take North Pole Position

Next supercontinent will form over the Arctic Ocean.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

By Kerri Smith of Nature magazine

In 50 million to 200 million years' time, all of Earth's current continents will be pushed together into a single landmass around the North Pole. That is the conclusion of an effort, detailed in the February 9 issue of Nature, to model the slow movements of the continents over the next tens of millions of years. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)

A supercontinent last formed 300 million years ago, when all the land masses grouped together on the equator as Pangaea, centered about where West Africa is now. After looking at the geology of mountain ranges around the world, geologists had assumed that the next supercontinent would form either in the same place as Pangaea, closing the Atlantic Ocean like an accordion, or on the other side of the world, in the middle of the current Pacific Ocean.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But Ross Mitchell, a geologist at Yale University in New Haven, Conn., and his colleagues have a new idea. They analyzed the magnetism of ancient rocks to work out their locations on the globe over time, and measured how the material under Earth's crust, the mantle, moves the continents that float on its surface.

They found that instead of staying near the equator, the next supercontinent--dubbed Amasia--should form 90 degrees away from Pangaea, over the Arctic.

-->Nature Podcast: Supercontinents: Click here to listen.

"First you would fuse the Americas together, then those would mutually migrate northward leading to collision with Europe and Asia more or less at the present day North Pole," says Mitchell. "Australia would continue with northward motion and snuggle up next to India."

Mitchell and his colleagues think that this is part of a pattern: Pangaea formed at about 90 degrees to the previous supercontinent, Rodinia, and Rodinia at about 90 degrees to Nuna, which existed around 2 billion years ago.

They call this model orthoversion, as opposed to introversion--in which the supercontinent forms where Pangea was--or extroversion, in which it moves round to the other side of the world, staying on the equator.

Orthoversion helps to clear up a conundrum that has bothered geologists. They knew there had been supercontinents in the past, and that these land masses had a variety of configurations, "but we weren't quite sure whether there was method in the madness as you went from one to the other," says Peter Cawood, a geologist at St Andrews University, UK.

The way Earth's continents move has implications for biology--for example, it affects how easily species can mingle over time. "Understanding the disposition of continental masses is fundamental in our understanding of Earth's history," says Cawood. "Rocks are our windows onto history."

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on February 8, 2012.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe