No Boilers

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A eolu water steam engine is spoken ot in the Cincinnati papers as a new invention.— The steam is produced without boilers by simply injecting cold water into generators. The amount of steam required to torce out or return the piston rod is made by the introduction to the influence of the fire at each moment of precisely the quantity of water needed, thus doing away with the necessity ot boilers. It is claimed that there is no possibility of an explosion, that greater power is obtained and less room occupied for the necessary machinery. The water falls into the engine, being first raised by a force pump into a reservoir situated above the engine, and thence inducted down as wanted.— [Ex. [The above project is nothing new. The same thing was proposed more than twenty years ago. It is founded upon a wrong principle and cannot succeed.

Scientific American Magazine Vol 8 Issue 42This article was published with the title “No Boilers” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 8 No. 42 (), p. 331
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican07021853-331c

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe